Acute blood-brain barrier disruption using electrical energy based therapy

ABSTRACT

A method is provided for ablating brain tissue of a living mammal comprising: placing first and second electrodes in a brain of the living mammal; applying a plurality of electrical pulses through the first and second placed electrodes which are predetermined to: cause irreversible electroporation (IRE) of brain tissue of the mammal within a target ablation zone; and cause a temporary disruption of a blood brain barrier (BBB) within a surrounding zone that surrounds the target ablation zone to allow material in a blood vessel to be transferred to the surrounding zone through the temporarily disrupted BBB. Such methods are useful for delivering large molecule material within a blood vessel of the brain across the BBB, where the large molecule is otherwise blocked by the BBB from passing through the blood vessel into the brain.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a Continuation-in-Part application of parent application U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/491,151, filed on Jun. 24, 2009, which published as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0030211 on Feb. 4, 2010, which relies on and claims the benefit of the filing dates of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 61/171,564, filed Apr. 22, 2009, 61/167,997, filed Apr. 9, 2009, and 61/075,216, filed Jun. 24, 2008, which parent application is a Continuation-in-Part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/432,295, filed on Apr. 29, 2009, which published as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0269317 on Oct. 29, 2009, which relies on and claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/125,840, filed Apr. 29, 2008. This application also relies on the disclosure of and claims priority to and the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/695,705, filed Aug. 31, 2012. The disclosures of these patent applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the field of medical therapies involving administering electrical treatment energy, as well as the field of drug delivery. Embodiments of the invention provide electrical energy based methods for temporarily disrupting the blood-brain-barrier for increasing intracellular delivery of drugs across the blood-brain barrier. Generally, the present invention provides for a combination of an electroporation-based therapy such as ECT, EGT, and IRE with the administration of therapeutic and diagnostic agents to cause the uptake of these agents into brain tissue. More specifically, embodiments of the invention provide electrical energy based therapies for disrupting the blood-brain barrier in a manner sufficient for delivering chemotherapeutic agents across the blood-brain barrier surrounding a zone of ablation. Methods of the invention are useful for treating and/or diagnosing brain tumors.

DESCRIPTION OF RELATED ART

In spite of aggressive therapy, the median survival for the majority of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is approximately 15 months (Stupp R, Mason W P, van den Bent M J, Weller M, Fisher B, et al. (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352: 987-996). One of the reasons for poor survival is that tumor cells diffusely infiltrate the brain parenchyma (Hochberg F H, Pruitt A (1980) Assumptions in the radiotherapy of glioblastoma. Neurology 30: 907-911). Effective treatment of GBM may be limited by inefficient intracellular delivery of chemotherapy. Most agents demonstrating in vitro cytotoxic effects against glial tumors do not cross the blood-brain-barrier (BBB) in vivo.

A number of attempts have been made to circumvent the blood-brain barrier to deliver therapeutic agents to undesirable tissue such as brain tumors. Among these are intrathecal injections, surgical implants, and osmotic techniques. Intrathecal injection allows sustained delivery of agents directly into brain ventricles and spinal fluid through infusion pumps implanted surgically. Osmotic approaches involve intraarterial injection of mannitol to cause endothelial cells forming the barrier to shrink, causing brief disruptions of the barrier. However, both these techniques carry the risk of severe side effects, including seizures during or after the procedure.

Although the BBB is compromised in portions of GBM, there is convincing evidence that these heterogeneous tumors frequently contain areas of infiltrative tumor which do not show enhancement, and therefore which are not likely affected by systemic chemotherapeutic agents (Barajas R F, Jr., Phillips J J, Parvataneni R, Molinaro A, Essock-Burns E, et al., (2012) Regional variation in histopathologic features of tumor specimens from treatment-naive glioblastoma correlates with anatomic and physiologic MR Imaging. Neuro Oncol 14: 942-954; Saraswathy S, Crawford F, Lamborn K, Pirzkall A, Chang S, et al., (2009) Evaluation of MR markers that predict survival in patients with newly diagnosed GBM prior to adjuvant therapy. Journal of Neuro-Oncology 91: 69-81). A technique that uniformly increases BBB permeability and therefore delivery of cytotoxic agents into tumors, may yield improved tumor control (Liu H L, Hua M Y, Chen P Y, Chu P C, Pan C H, et al., (2010) Blood-brain barrier disruption with focused ultrasound enhances delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs for glioblastoma treatment.

Radiology 255: 415-425 (“Liu et al., 2010”)). Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is a technique that uses pulsed electric fields to facilitate the uptake of chemotherapeutic agents, which then induces tumor cell death (Marty M, Sersa G, Garbay J R, Gehl J, Collins C G, et al., (2006) Electrochemotherapy—An easy, highly effective and safe treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous metastases: Results of ESOPE (European Standard Operating Procedures of Electrochemotherapy) study. European Journal of Cancer Supplements 4: 3-13; Salford L G, Persson B R, Brun A, Ceberg C P, Kongstad P C, et al., (1993) A new brain tumour therapy combining bleomycin with in vivo electropermeabilization. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 194: 938-943; Agerholm-Larsen B, Iversen H K, Ibsen P, Moller J M, Mahmood F, et al., (2011) Preclinical Validation of Electrochemotherapy as an Effective Treatment for Brain Tumors. Cancer Research 71: 3753-3762).

Therapeutic irreversible electroporation (IRE) is an emerging technology that also uses pulsed electric fields to produce non-thermal ablation of tumors (Al-Sakere B, Andre F, Bernat C, Connault E, Opolon P, et al. (2007) Tumor ablation with irreversible electroporation. PLoS ONE 2: e1135 (“Al-Sakere et al., 2007”); Davalos R V, Mir L M, Rubinsky B (2005) Tissue ablation with irreversible electroporation. Ann Biomed Eng 33: 223-231; Edd J F, Horowitz L, Davalos R V, Mir L M, Rubinsky B (2006) In vivo results of a new focal tissue ablation technique: irreversible electroporation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53: 1409-1415; Appelbaum L, Ben-David E, Sosna J, Nissenbaum Y, Goldberg S N (2012) US Findings after Irreversible Electroporation Ablation: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation. Radiology 262: 117-125). IRE creates a sharply delineated volume of ablated tissue, with sub-millimeter resolution (Ben-David E, Appelbaum L, Sosna J, Nissenbaum I, Goldberg S N (2012) Characterization of Irreversible Electroporation Ablation in In vivo Porcine Liver. Am J Roentgenol 198: W62-W68). IRE treatments involve inserting needle-like electrodes into the tumor and delivering a series of low-energy pulses to permanently destabilize the cell membranes, inducing death without thermal damage (Al-Sakere et al., 2007; Davalos R V, Rubinsky B (2008) Temperature considerations during irreversible electroporation. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 51: 5617-5622). IRE primarily affects the cell membrane of target cells, sparing important tissue components such as major blood vessels and extracellular matrix (Lee E W, Loh C T, Kee S T (2007) Imaging guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation: ultrasound and immunohistological correlation. Technol Cancer Res Treat 6: 287-294).

It has been demonstrated that IRE safely disrupts the BBB and precisely ablates normal and neoplastic brain tissue (Garcia P A, Rossmeisl J H Jr, Robertson J, Ellis T L, Davalos R V: Pilot study of irreversible electroporation for intracranial surgery. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009:6513-6516, 2009 (Abstract); Ellis T L, Garcia P A, Rossmeisl J H, Jr., Henao-Guerrero N, Robertson J, et al. (2011) Nonthermal irreversible electroporation for intracranial surgical applications. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg 114: 681-688 (“Ellis et al., 2011”); Garcia P A, Rossmeisl J H, Neal II R E, Ellis T L, Olson J, et al., (2010) Intracranial nonthermal irreversible electroporation: In vivo analysis. J Membr Biol 236: 127-136 (“Garcia et al., 2010”); Garcia P A, Pancotto T, Rossmeisl J H, Henao-Guerrero N, Gustafson N R, et al., (2011) Non-thermal irreversible electroporation (N-TIRE) and adjuvant fractionated radiotherapeutic multimodal therapy for intracranial malignant glioma in a canine patient. Technol Cancer Res Treat 10: 73-83 (“Garcia et al., 2011”); Hjouj M, Last D, Guez D, Daniels D, Lavee J, et al., (2011) Electroporation-Induced BBB Disruption and Tissue Damage Depicted by MRI. Neuro-Oncology 13: 114).

It is believed that there is a minimal electric field at which BBB disruption occurs surrounding an IRE-induced zone of ablation and that this transient response can be measured using Gd uptake as a surrogate marker for BBB disruption (Liu et al., 2010; Frigeni V, Miragoli L, Grotti A, Lorusso V (2001) Comparative Study Between Gadobenate Dimeglumine and Gadobutrol in Rats with Brain Ischemia: Evaluation of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials. Investigative Radiology 36: 561-572 (“Frigeni et al., 2001”); Noce A L, Frigeni V, Demicheli F, Miragoli L, Tirone P (1999) Neurotolerability of Gadobenate Dimeglumine in a Rat Model of Focal Brain Ischemia: EEG Evaluation. Investigative Radiology 34: 262 (“Noce et al., 1999”); Kohrmann M, Struffert T, Frenzel T, Schwab S, Doerfler A (2012) The Hyperintense Acute Reperfusion Marker on Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Caused by Gadolinium in the Cerebrospinal Fluid. Stroke 43: 259-261 (“Kohrmann et al., 2012”)). This phenomenon may be used to improve delivery of otherwise poorly diffusible anti-tumoral agents across the BBB into regions containing microscopic glioma infiltrates. Thus, irreversible electroporation in combination with pharmacotherapy may be a much more effective treatment for GBM due to its ability to destroy tumor cells within a discrete zone while increasing susceptibility to exogenous agents outside the zone of ablation. Using IRE to destroy the tumor and/or increase the delivery of therapeutic agents to facilitate treatment of surrounding “at risk” tumor margins may therefore result in improved tumor control by treating the area in which most recurrences occur.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides electrical energy based methods wherein pulsed electric fields are delivered into brain tissue (such as a tumor) of an animal, to cause temporary disruption of the Blood-Brain-Barrier (BBB) in a volume of brain tissue in the vicinity of the source of the pulsed electric fields over an interval, and wherein an agent is administered to the animal so that it is present in blood to provide for uptake of the agent into the volume of brain tissue in which the BBB is disrupted over the interval.

In one embodiment, the invention provides a method of delivering an agent, such as an exogenous agent, to a volume of brain tissue of an animal through disruption of the blood-brain barrier, comprising one or more or a combination of: a. administering an exogenous agent to the animal; b. inserting a probe into or proximal brain tissue of the animal; and c. delivering pulsed electric fields through the probe. In embodiments, the pulsed electric fields can be administered in a manner that reversibly disrupts the blood-brain barrier for an interval in a volume of brain tissue in the vicinity of the probe. Additionally, the agent is administered to the animal at such a time wherein the agent is present in the blood during the interval of blood-brain barrier disruption, such that it may cross the blood-brain barrier and be delivered to the volume of brain tissue in the vicinity of the probe/electrode during the period of disruption.

Methods within the scope of the invention include a method for ablating brain tissue of a living mammal comprising: placing first and second electrodes in a brain of the living mammal; applying a plurality of electrical pulses through the first and second placed electrodes which are predetermined to: cause irreversible electroporation (IRE) of brain tissue of the mammal within a target ablation zone; and cause a temporary disruption of a blood brain barrier (BBB) within a surrounding zone that surrounds the target ablation zone to allow material in a blood vessel to be transferred to the surrounding zone through the temporarily disrupted BBB.

Such methods can further comprise delivering large molecule material within a blood vessel of the brain, the large molecule being sufficiently large to be blocked by the BBB from passing through the blood vessel. In embodiments, the large molecule material is delivered to the blood vessel prior to applying the plurality of electrical pulses. Specific embodiments include wherein the large molecule includes a chemotherapeutic agent.

Methods of the invention can further comprise, after applying the plurality of electrical pulses, detecting the occurrence of IRE in the target ablation zone and temporary BBB disruption in the surrounding zone.

The step of applying can include applying each electrical pulse as a direct current pulse having a pulse duration of at least 5 microseconds. For example, in embodiments, the step of applying can include applying each electrical pulse as a direct current pulse having a pulse duration of between 5 and 100 microseconds.

In embodiments, the step of applying can include applying the plurality of pulses which are predetermined to be: sufficiently strong to cause non-thermal irreversible electroporation (NTIRE) of the brain tissue within the target ablation zone; and sufficiently strong to cause a temporary disruption of BBB within the surrounding zone, but insufficient to cause NTIRE in the surrounding zone.

The target tissue, such as brain tissue, is a tumor in or near the brain, such as glioblastoma multiforme.

The pulsed electric fields can be used to deliver electrical energy that is at a level that provides reversible electroporation, electrochemotherapy, electrogenetherapy, irreversible electroporation, and/or supraporation. Electrical pulses used in the methods, systems, and devices of the invention can have a waveform which is square, triangular, trapezoidal, exponential decay, sawtooth, sinusoidal, or of alternating polarity, or comprise a combination of one or more waveforms. For example, embodiments of the invention can comprise devices, systems, and methods operably configured such that one or more electrical pulse characterized by any one or more of the following can be administered: (a) an amplitude in the range of about 10 V/cm to about 6000 V/cm; (b) a duration in the range of about 10 ns to about 10 seconds; (c) a DC pulse or an AC signal with a frequency in the range of about 1 Hz to about 10 MHz; or (d) a number of pulses in the range of about 1 to about 1000.

Methods of the invention can include ablating a tumor, an anatomical structure, or target tissue at least partially or completely using irreversible electroporation.

In embodiments of the invention, the material such as an active agent is a bioactive agent. The material or bioactive agent can be at least one cancer therapeutic agent chosen from one or more of a chemotherapy agent, a targeted cancer therapy agent, a differentiating therapy agent, a hormone therapy agent, and an immunotherapy agent. The bioactive agent can be a combination of cancer therapeutic agents.

According to various embodiments, the agent can be a diagnostic agent, such as an imaging agent.

Methods of the invention include administering the agent or material before, during, simultaneously with, or after the electrical energy based therapy is applied.

The agent can be administered at a selected dose, route of administration, and/or timing to provide a therapeutic concentration of the agent in blood during the interval of blood-brain barrier disruption.

In embodiments of the invention, the pulsed electric fields are delivered through the probe at a voltage-to-distance ratio of at least about 50 V/cm up to about 5,000 V/cm. For example, the electrical energy based therapy can be administered at a voltage-to-distance ratio of at least about 200 V/cm, 400 V/cm, 600 V/cm, 800 V/cm, or 1000 V/cm, or any combination thereof. Further, for example, the pulsed electric fields can be delivered at a voltage-to-distance ratio ranging from about 200-1000 V/cm.

According to embodiments, the pulsed electric fields can be delivered through the probe at a cycle time of about 1 Hz.

In embodiments of the invention, the pulsed electric fields are delivered through the probe such that the length of the pulses is in the range of about 10 microseconds to about 90 microseconds.

In embodiments of the invention, the pulsed electric fields are delivered through the probe such that the length of the pulses is about 50 microseconds.

In embodiments of the invention, the pulsed electric fields are delivered such that the number of pulses is about 8 or more, such as about 80 pulses or more, or for example about 90 pulses or more.

In embodiments of the invention, the animal is a laboratory animal selected from the group consisting of a rat, mouse, hamster, a cat, a dog, a sheep, a Cynomolgus macaque, a Rhesus macaque, a common marmoset, a squirrel monkey, an olive baboon, a vervet monkey, a night monkey, or a chimpanzee. Further, for example, according to the invention the animal can be an animal under veterinary care including a cat, a dog, a sheep, a goat, a horse, a cow, or an exotic animal. In embodiments of the invention, the animal is a human subject, or a human under a physician's care.

In embodiments of the invention, the volume of brain tissue in vicinity of the electrode is parenchyma.

In embodiments of the invention, the exogenous agent is a small molecule, a radioisotope, a natural protein, a synthetic protein, a natural peptide, synthetic peptide, a peptidomimetic, an antibody, an antibody fragment, an antibody conjugate, a small interfering RNA (siRNA), an antisense RNA, an aptamer, a ribozyme, an oligonucleotide, a viral vector, or an engineered cell.

In embodiments of the invention, the exogenous agent is administered to the animal through a route of administration chosen from one or more of parenteral, intravenous, intraarterial, intradermal, transdermal, intranasal, intraperitoneal, intramuscular, buccal, oral, and transmucosal.

Systems are also included within the scope of the invention, such as a system for ablating brain tissue of a living mammal comprising: a voltage generator operable to generate a plurality of electrical pulses between first and second electrodes; and a treatment planning module adapted to control the voltage generator to generate the plurality of pulses which are predetermined to: cause irreversible electroporation (IRE) of brain tissue of the mammal within a target ablation zone; and cause a temporary disruption of a blood brain barrier (BBB) within a surrounding zone that surrounds the target ablation zone to allow material in a blood vessel to be transferred to the surrounding zone through the temporarily disrupted BBB.

Such systems can further comprise a detector that detects the occurrence of IRE in the target ablation zone and temporary BBB disruption in the surrounding zone.

Additionally or alternatively, the treatment planning module of such systems can be adapted to control the voltage generator to generate each electrical pulse as a direct current pulse having a pulse duration of at least 5 microseconds. For example, the treatment planning module in embodiments can be adapted to control the voltage generator to generate each electrical pulse as a direct current pulse having a pulse duration of between 5 and 100 microseconds.

Even further, included within the scope of the invention is a system for ablating brain tissue of a living mammal comprising: a voltage generator operable to generate a plurality of electrical pulses between first and second electrodes; a memory; a processor coupled to the memory; and a treatment planning module stored in the memory and executable by the processor, the treatment planning module adapted to control the voltage generator to generate the plurality of pulses which are predetermined to be: sufficiently strong to cause non-thermal irreversible electroporation (NTIRE) of brain tissue of the mammal within a target ablation zone; and sufficiently strong to cause a temporary disruption of a blood brain barrier (BBB) within a surrounding zone that surrounds the target ablation zone, but insufficient to cause NTIRE in the surrounding zone, to allow material in a blood vessel to be transferred to the surrounding zone through the temporarily disrupted BBB.

Such systems can further comprise a detector that detects the occurrence of IRE in the target ablation zone and temporary BBB disruption in the surrounding zone.

In embodiments, the systems can be configured such that the treatment planning module is adapted to control the voltage generator to generate each electrical pulse as a direct current pulse having a pulse duration of at least 5 microseconds. For example, the treatment planning module can be adapted to control the voltage generator to generate each electrical pulse as a direct current pulse having a pulse duration of between 5 and 100 microseconds.

Additional embodiments, features, and advantages of the invention can be found in the foregoing Detailed Description of Various Embodiments of the Invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings illustrate certain aspects of embodiments of the present invention, and should not be used to limit or define the invention. Together with the written description the drawings serve to explain certain principles of the invention.

Additionally, the patent application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a hollow core device according to embodiments of the invention.

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a device with moveable sheath according to embodiments of the invention.

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a representative system of the invention.

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a representative treatment control computer of the invention.

FIG. 5 is schematic diagram illustrating details of the generator shown in the system of FIG. 3, including elements for detecting an over-current condition.

FIGS. 6A-6D are images showing histopathologic evaluations of IRE-induced effects determined with Hematoxylin and Eosin stain.

FIG. 7 is a series of magnetic resonance images and images of Evan's Blue brain sections showing morphologic characteristics of IRE-induced BBB disruption comparing where no pulses are applied and treatments involving 50-μs pulses applied at 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1000 V/cm using 1-mm electrodes (0.45 mm diameter).

FIGS. 8A-8H are magnetic resonance images of brain sections showing qualitative representations of IRE-induced BBB disruption and in particular, 2D IRE lesion tracing on the coronal (FIG. 8A, FIG. 8B), dorsal (FIG. 8C, FIG. 8D), and sagittal (FIG. 8E, FIG. 8F) planes with the corresponding non-contiguous (FIG. 8G) and contiguous (FIG. 8H) 3D reconstruction zones of ablation representative of 400 V/cm and 1000 V/cm IRE treatments, respectively.

FIGS. 9A and 9B are graphs showing quantification of IRE-induced BBB disruption from the 3D MRI reconstructions, where volumes (FIG. 9A) and mean concentrations (FIG. 9B) of Gd enhancement are provided as a function of the applied voltage-to-distance ratio and timing of Gd administration.

FIGS. 10A-10C are electric field and temperature distributions depicting the zones of IRE ablation and BBB disruption using ninety 50-μs pulses at 1000 V/cm and Gd administered 5 min prior to pulse delivery using the cross-sectional MRI/H&E data from Table 2. Specifically, FIG. 10A compares the IRE volume of ablation with the volume of BBB disruption. FIG. 10B compares the volume of IRE ablation with the volume of temperature elevated to at least 50° C. FIG. 10C displays the cross-sectional areas of IRE ablation (H&E), BBB disruption (Gd in MRI), and elevated temperatures (T 50° C.) surrounding the rostral electrode as described in Table 2.

FIGS. 11A-11F are the electric field distributions (FIGS. 11B-F) using the 3D MRI reconstruction (FIG. 11A) of a rat brain. FIGS. 11B-11F display the electric field threshold necessary for match the volume of BBB disruption as measured experimentally with the Gd enhancement in the 7.0-T in vivo MRI. The required electric field to achieve BBB disruption was 298 V/cm (9.07 mm³), 328 V/cm (19.83 mm³), 406 V/cm (24.61 mm³), and 476 V/cm (27.69 mm³) for the 400, 600, 800, and 1000 V/cm IRE treatments, respectively. Note: Due to the 4-mm separation distance between the electrodes, a 400 V pulse represents a 1000 V/cm voltage-to-distance ratio.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

Reference will now be made in detail to various exemplary embodiments of the invention. However, the embodiments described in the description and shown in the figures are illustrative only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention, and changes may be made in the specific embodiments described in this specification and accompanying drawings that a person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize are within the scope and spirit of the invention.

Throughout the present teachings, any and all of the one, two, or more features and/or components disclosed or suggested herein, explicitly or implicitly, may be practiced and/or implemented in any combination of two, three, or more thereof, whenever and wherever appropriate as understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. The various features and/or components disclosed herein are all illustrative for the underlying concepts, and thus are non-limiting to their actual descriptions. Any means for achieving substantially the same functions are considered as foreseeable alternatives and equivalents, and are thus fully described in writing and fully enabled. The various examples, illustrations, and embodiments described herein are by no means, in any degree or extent, limiting the broadest scopes of the inventions presented herein or in any future applications claiming priority to the instant application.

In one embodiment, the present invention provides a method of delivering an exogenous agent to a volume of brain tissue of an animal through disruption of the BBB, comprising: a. administering an agent to the animal, such as an exogenous agent; b. advancing a probe with an energizable electrode into or adjacent brain tissue of the animal; and c. delivering one or more pulsed electric fields through the probe; wherein: d. the pulsed electric fields reversibly disrupt the BBB for an interval in a volume of brain tissue in the vicinity of the probe; and e. the agent is administered to the animal at such a time wherein the agent is present in the blood during the interval of BBB disruption, such that the agent is capable of crossing the BBB and capable of being delivered to the volume of brain tissue in the vicinity of the electrode during the period of disruption. According to embodiments, the pulsed electric fields are of a magnitude and duration capable of administering IRE to a target tissue within the volume of brain tissue.

The animal can be any vertebrate or craniate. In one aspect, the animal is a laboratory animal including, without limitation, a rodent (e.g. rat, mouse, hamster), a cat, a dog, a sheep, or a non-human primate (e.g. Cynomolgus macaque, Rhesus macaque, common marmoset, squirrel monkey, olive baboon, vervet monkey (also known as grivet or African green monkey), and night monkey (also known as owl monkey), or chimpanzee). In another aspect, the animal is an animal under veterinary care, including a companion animal such as a cat or a dog, or a farm animal such as a sheep, a goat, a horse, a cow, or an exotic animal. In another aspect, the animal is a human such as a human under medical care (i.e., a human subject or patient).

The pulsed electric fields can deliver energy that is below the threshold for creating a zone of ablation, or greater than the threshold for creating a zone of ablation. In other words, the pulsed electric fields may deliver energy that is below the threshold for irreversible electroporation (e.g., at a level providing reversible electroporation or blood-brain-barrier disruption), or greater than the threshold for irreversible electroporation. If the pulsed electric fields provide a level of energy suitable for blood-brain-barrier disruption, they may be provided at a level suitable for delivery of chemicals or genes (e.g., electrochemotherapy (ECT) or electrogenetherapy (EGT)).

In a preferred embodiment, the pulsed electric fields delivery energy to brain tissue that is greater than the threshold for irreversible electroporation. In one aspect, the energy delivered to brain tissue is an electric field distribution. The electric field distribution may be influenced by factors such as the geometry (e.g., shape, diameter, and length) and positioning of the electrodes, the dielectric properties of the brain tissue to be treated, and the applied voltage. Such factors determine whether the electric field distribution is sufficient for irreversible electroporation.

The target tissue within the volume of brain tissue is preferably undesirable tissue such as a tumor. Examples of tumors that may be treated with the present invention include, without limitation, Astrocytic tumors (e.g. Subependymal giant cell astrocytoma, Pilocytic astrocytoma, Pilomyxoid astrocytoma, Diffuse astrocytoma, Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma, Anaplastic astrocytoma, Glioblastoma, Giant cell glioblastoma, Gliosarcoma), Oligondendroglial tumors (e.g. Oligodendroglioma, Anaplastic oligodendroglioma), Oligoastrocytic tumors (e.g. Oligoastrocytoma, Anaplastic oligoastrocytoma), Ependymal tumor (e.g. Subependymoma, Myxopapillary ependymoma, Ependymoma, Anaplastic ependymoma), Choroid plexus tumors (e.g. Choroid plexus papilloma, Atypical choroid plexus papilloma, Choroid plexus carcinoma), Other neuroepithelial tumors (e.g. Angiocentric glioma, Chordoid glioma of the third ventricle), Neuronal and mixed neuronal-glial tumors (e.g. Gangliocytoma, Ganglioglioma, Anaplastic ganglioma, Desmoplastic infantile astrocytoma and ganglioglioma, Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor, Central neurocytoma, Extraventricular neurocytoma, Cerebellar liponeurocytoma, Paraganglioma of the spinal cord, Papillary glioneuronal tumor, Rosette-forming glioneural tumor of the fourth ventricle), Pineal tumors (e.g. Pineocytoma, Pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation, Pineoblastoma, Papillary tumor of the pineal region), Embryonal tumors (e.g. Medulloblastoma, CNS primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET), Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor) Tumors of the cranial and paraspinal nerves (e.g. Schwannoma, Neurofibroma, Perineurioma, Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), Meningeal tumors (e.g. Meningioma, Atypical meningioma, Anaplastic/malignant meningioma, Hemangiopericytoma, Anaplastic hemangiopericytoma, Hemangioblastoma), and tumors of the sellar region (e.g. Craniopharyngioma, Granular cell tumor of the neurohypophysis, Pituicytoma, Spindle cell oncocytoma of the adenohypophysis). Brain tumors may also include metastases from primary tumors originating from tissues and organs outside the brain, including but not limited to breast, ovary, prostate, lung, liver, colon, bladder, kidney, and skin. It is conceived that the present invention may be used to treat any tumor of the central nervous system classified by the World Health Organization in any edition of such classification, such as the 2007 edition (Louis, D N, Ohgaki H, Wiestler, O D, Cavenee, W K. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Nervous System. IARC, Lyon, 2007). In a preferred embodiment, the present invention is used to treat glioblastoma multiforme.

The present invention extends and improves on prior electroporation-based therapies (EBT) by providing new methods for electroporation-based treatment of tumors of the brain. Tumors of the brain such as glioblastoma multiforme have poor survival in part because the regions surrounding the solid tumor may contain diffuse infiltrations of tumor cells in the brain parenchyma. While IRE is effective in treating solid tumors, it may spare the killing of infiltrating tumor cells in these regions. Further, because the brain is protected by the BBB, a number of therapeutic and diagnostic agents are unable to be taken up into brain tumor cells using conventional techniques. As demonstrated in the Examples, the present inventors have found that delivery of pulsed electric fields through irreversible electroporation causes a transient disruption in the BBB (e.g., using voltage-to-distance ratios of 200 V/cm to 1000 V/cm) in regions surrounding the zone of ablation. The extent and duration of BBB disruption was positively correlated with electric field strength and occurred even at electric field strengths in which electroporation was predominately or exclusively reversible. The irreversible electroporation protocols resulted in the uptake of both low and higher molecular weight agents, indicating increased BBB permeability to solutes, ions, and protein. Thus, the present invention provides for a combination of an electroporation-based therapy such as ECT, EGT, and IRE with the administration of therapeutic and diagnostic agents to cause the uptake of these agents into brain tissue. Embodiments of the present invention include therapeutic methods that employ IRE in combination with an exogenous agent to kill undesirable cells (e.g. infiltrating tumor cells) in the vicinity of treated tumors (e.g. tumor margins).

In general, the present invention is a method providing 1) pulsed electric fields into brain tissue (such as a tumor) of an animal, to cause temporary disruption of the BBB in a volume of brain tissue in the vicinity of the source of the pulsed electric fields over an interval and 2) administration of an exogenous agent to the animal so that it is present in blood to provide for uptake of the agent into the volume of brain tissue in which the BBB is disrupted over the interval.

As provided in the Examples, the volume of brain tissue and duration in which the BBB is disrupted positively correlates with electric field strength of the pulsed electric fields. Thus, the skilled artisan can design protocols to target a particular volume of tissue to be treated with an exogenous agent through adjusting the voltage-to-distance ratio used in the protocol, among any other parameters involved in the treatment. In a preferred embodiment, the voltage-to-distance ratio is sufficient to cause partial or complete ablation of brain tumor through IRE, and treat a volume of brain tissue in the vicinity of the treated tumor (e.g. tumor margin) with an exogenous agent, such as a cancer therapeutic agent.

Devices, systems, and methods for causing partial or complete ablation of a brain tumor through IRE are known, and have been described in part in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0030211 A1, which the present application is a Continuation-in-Part application of. Thus, the following description will demonstrate the present invention as it applies to methods of treating a brain tumor with IRE.

In general, methods of treating with IRE comprise temporarily implanting or disposing one or more electrodes, which may be present on the same or different devices, into or immediately adjacent a tumor, and applying an electrical field to the tumor in multiple pulses or bursts over a prescribed or predetermined period of time to cause irreversible cell death to some or all of the tumor cells. Preferably, irreversible damage to non-tumor cells in proximity to the tumor is minimal and does not result in significant or long-lasting damage to healthy tissues or organs (or a significant number of cells of those tissues or organs). According to methods of the invention, cell killing is predominantly, essentially, or completely due to non-thermal effects of the electrical pulsing. Methods can further comprise removing the electrode(s) after suitable treatment with the electrical fields. As a general matter, because the methods involve temporary implantation of relatively small electrodes, it is minimally invasive and does not result in the need for significant post-treatment procedures or care. Likewise, it does not result in significant ancillary or collateral damage to the subject being treated.

In practicing the methods, the number of electrodes, either on a single or multiple devices, used can be selected by the practitioner based on the size and shape of the tumor to be treated and the size and shape of the electrode. Thus, embodiments of the invention include the use of one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten or more electrodes. Each electrode can be independently sized, shaped, and positioned in or adjacent the tumor to be treated. In addition, the number and spacing of electrodes on a single device can be adjusted as desired. As detailed below, the location, shape, and size of electrodes can be selected to produce three-dimensional killing zones of numerous shapes and sizes, allowing for non-thermal treatment of tumors of varying shapes and sizes.

In embodiments, pulse durations for ablation of solid tumors can be relatively short, thus reducing the probability of generation of thermal conditions and excessive charges that cause collateral damage to healthy tissues. More specifically, the present invention recognizes that, the pulse length for highly efficient tissue ablation can be lower than 100 microseconds (100 μs). Indeed, it has surprisingly been determined that a pulse length of 25 us or lower can successfully cause non-thermal cell death. Thus, in embodiments, the methods of treatment can use pulse lengths of 10 μs, 15 μs, 20 μs, 25 μs, 30 μs, 35 μs, 40 μs, 45 μs, 50 μs, 55 μs, 60 μs, 65 μs, 70 μs, 75 μs, 80 μs, 85 μs, or 90 μs. Preferably, to most effectively minimize peripheral damage due to heat, pulse lengths are limited to 90 μs or less, for example 50 μs or less, such as 25 μs. By reducing the pulse length, as compared to prior art techniques for IRE, larger electric fields can be applied to the treatment area while avoiding thermal damage to non-target tissue (as well as to target tissue). As a result of the decreased pulse length and concomitant reduction in heat production, the methods of the invention allow for treatment of tissues having higher volumes (e.g., larger tumors) than possible if prior art methods were to be employed for in vivo treatment of tumors.

In exemplary embodiments, the pulse duration of the electroporation-based therapy can exceed 100 μs. Any length pulse or pulse train can be administered in embodiments according to the invention. For example, pulse lengths of about 1 picosecond to 100 seconds can be used, such as from 10 picoseconds to about 10 seconds, or for example from about 100 picoseconds to about 1 second, or from 1 nanosecond to 100 milliseconds, or from about 10 nanoseconds to about 10 milliseconds, or from about 100 nanoseconds to about 1 millisecond, or from about 1 microsecond or 10 microseconds to about 100 microseconds. It is preferred in some embodiments to have a pulse length ranging from about 100 microseconds to about 1 second, such as a pulse length of about 110, or 120, or 130, or 140, or 150, or 200, or 300, or 350, or 400, or 500, or 600, or 700, or 800 or 900 microseconds, or about 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 milliseconds, or even 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, or 100 milliseconds, or even for example from about 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, or 900 milliseconds and so on.

It has also been determined that voltages traditionally used for IRE are too high for beneficial treatment of tumors in situ. For example, typically, IRE is performed using voltages of between 4000 V/cm to 1500 V/cm. The present invention provides for use of voltages of much lower power. For example, the present methods can be performed using less than 1500 V/cm. Experiments performed by the inventors have shown that 2000 V/cm at greater than or equal to 1 cm between electrodes can cause excessive edema and stroke in patients when applied to brain tissue. Advantageously, for treatment of brain tumors, applied fields of about 500 V/cm to 1000 V/cm are used. Thus, in general for treatment of brain tumors, applied fields of less than 1000 V/cm can be used.

In embodiments of methods of the invention, the electroporation-based therapy is provided at a higher energy than conventional electroporation-based therapies. In an exemplary embodiment, the amplitude of the pulses of the electroporation-based therapy exceeds 2000 V/cm, including an amplitude of about 2200 V/cm, or 2500 V/cm, such as about 3000 V/cm, or 3500 V/cm, or about 4000 V/cm, such as 4500 V/cm, or about 5000 V/cm, such as about 5500 V/cm, or about 6000 V/cm, or about 6500 V/cm, such as about 7000 V/cm, or about 7500 V/cm, such as 8000 V/cm, or about 8500 V/cm, including 9000 V/cm, or about 9500 V/cm, such as about 10,000 V/cm and so on.

Further, it has been discovered that the number of electrical pulses that can be applied to successfully treat tumors can be quite high. The present invention provides for the use of a relatively high number of pulses, on the order of 90 pulses or greater. For example, in exemplary embodiments, 90 pulses are used. Other embodiments include the use of more than 90 pulses, such as 100 pulses, 110 pulses, or more. In exemplary embodiments, the number of pulses of the electroporation-based therapy can exceed 100. According to embodiments, the number of pulses can range from about 5 to about 400 pulses, such as from about 10 to about 350 pulses, or for example from about 15 to about 300 pulses, including from about 20 to about 250 pulses, or from about 25 to about 200 pulses, such as from about 30 to about 150 pulses, for example from about 50 to about 125 pulses, such as from about 75 to about 175 pulses, or from about 90 to 110 pulses, such as about 100 pulses.

According to methods of the invention, cycle times for pulses are set generally about 1 Hz. Furthermore, it has been found that alternating polarity of adjacent electrodes minimizes charge build up and provides a more uniform treatment zone. More specifically, in experiments performed by the inventors, a superficial focal ablative IRE lesion was created in the cranial aspect of the temporal lobe (ectosylvian gyrus) using the NanoKnife® (Angiodynamics, Queensbury, N.Y.) generator, blunt tip bipolar electrode (Angiodynamics, No. 204002XX) by delivering 9 sets of ten 50 us pulses (voltage-to-distance ratio 2000 V/cm) with alternating polarity between the sets to prevent charge build-up on the stainless steel electrode surfaces. These parameters were determined from ex-vivo experiments on canine brain and they ensured that the charge delivered during the procedure was lower than the charge delivered to the human brain during electroconvulsive therapy (an FDA approved treatment for major depression). Excessive charge delivery to the brain can induce memory loss, and thus is preferably avoided.

In exemplary embodiments, the pulse rate of the electroporation-based therapy can exceed 1 Hz. Specific method embodiments may employ administering electroporation based therapy using a pulse rate of about 1 Hz to 20 GHz, such as for example from about 10 Hz to 20 GHz, or about 50 Hz to 500 Hz, or 100 Hz to 1 kHz, or kHz to 100 kHz, or from 250 kHz to 10 MHz, or 500 kHz to 1 MHz, such as from 900 kHz to 2 MHz, or from about 100 MHz to about 10 GHz, including from about 200 MHz to about 15 GHz and so on.

Methods of the invention encompass the use of multiple electrodes and different voltages applied for each electrode to precisely control the three-dimensional shape of the electric field for tissue ablation. More specifically, it has been found that varying the amount of electrical energy emitted by different electrodes placed in a tissue to be treated allows the practitioner to finely tune the three-dimensional shape of the electrical field that irreversibly disrupts cell membranes, causing cell death. Likewise, the polarity of electrodes can be varied to achieve different three-dimensional electrical fields. Furthermore, one of the advantages of embodiments of the invention is to generate electric field distributions that match complex tumor shapes by manipulating the potentials of multiple electrodes. In these embodiments, multiple electrodes are energized with different potential combinations, as opposed to an “on/off” system like radio frequency ablation, to maximize tumor treatment and minimize damage to surrounding healthy tissue.

For example, a treatment protocol according to the invention could include a plurality of electrodes. According to the desired treatment pattern, the plurality of electrodes can be disposed in various positions relative to one another. In a particular example, a plurality of electrodes can be disposed in a relatively circular pattern with a single electrode disposed in the interior of the circle, such as at approximately the center. Any configuration of electrodes is possible and the arrangement need not be circular but any shape periphery can be used depending on the area to be treated, including any regular or irregular polygon shape, including convex or concave polygon shapes. The single centrally located electrode can be a ground electrode while the other electrodes in the plurality can be energized. Any number of electrodes can be in the plurality such as from about 1 to 20. Indeed, even 3 electrodes can form a plurality of electrodes where one ground electrode is disposed between two electrodes capable of being energized, or 4 electrodes can be disposed in a manner to provide two electrode pairs (each pair comprising one ground and one electrode capable of being energized). During treatment, methods of treating can involve energizing the electrodes in any sequence, such as energizing one or more electrode simultaneously, and/or energizing one or more electrode in a particular sequence, such as sequentially, in an alternating pattern, in a skipping pattern, and/or energizing multiple electrodes but less than all electrodes simultaneously, for example.

According to methods of the invention, the separation of the electrodes within or about the tissue to be treated can be varied to provide a desired result. For example, the distance between two or more electrodes (whether ground or energizable) can be varied to achieve different three-dimensional electrical fields for irreversible disruption of cell membranes. Indeed, depending on the target region to be treated, the electrodes can be placed at a separation distance from one another ranging for example from 1 mm to about 10 cm, such as from 2 mm to about 5 cm, or from 3 mm to 2 cm, or from mm to 1 cm, and so on. Any combination of number and placement of electrodes can be used for a particular treatment desired. The three-dimensional shape can thus be set to ablate diseased tissue, but partially or completely avoid healthy tissue in situations where the interface between healthy and diseased tissue shows a complex three dimensional shape.

Methods of embodiments of the invention may include, in addition to use of the electrodes and devices of the invention, other measures to further reduce the potential for thermal damage to non-target tissue. This may include, but is not limited to, use of a range of pulse durations, duty cycles and frequencies of pulse trains, amplitudes, number of pulses, voltages, pulse shapes, etc. that have been shown by the inventors to induce cell death in a target tissue while minimizing thermal damage to surrounding cells and tissue. Ranges that may be useful for the practice of methods of the invention are discussed in several U.S. patent applications and patents, including U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2009/0269317, 2010/0030211, 2010/0331758, 2010/0261994, 2011/0106221, 2012/0109122, 2013/0184702; as well as U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,282,631 and 8,465,484, and International Patent Application Publication Nos. WO2009/134876, WO2010/151277, WO2010/118387, WO2011/047387, WO2012/071526, WO2012/088149, as well as U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/012,832 entitled “System and Method for Estimating a Treatment Volume for Administering Electrical-Energy-Based Therapies,” filed Aug. 28, 2013, and U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2010/0250209, entitled System and Method for Estimating a Treatment Region for a Medical Treatment Device, published Sep. 30, 2010, the disclosure of each of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

The methods of the invention are well suited for treatment of tumors using non-thermal IRE. To better ensure that cell ablation is a result of non-thermal effect, and to better protect healthy tissue surrounding the site of treatment, the methods can further comprise cooling the electrodes during the treatment process. By applying a heat sink, such as a cooling element in an electrode (discussed below), generation of heat in and around tissue in close proximity to the electrodes can be minimized, resulting in a more consistent application of non-thermal IRE to the tissue and a more controlled application of cell killing to only those tissues desired to be treated.

The methods of the invention, in embodiments, include the use of electrodes of different sizes and shapes, including plate-type and/or needle-type (whether blunt tip or sharp tip) ground and/or energizable electrodes. In embodiments, the electrical field distribution may be altered by use of electrodes having different diameters, lengths, and shapes. Thus, the use of different sizes and shapes of conducting surfaces can be used to control the electrical fields used for cell ablation. In certain embodiments, the methods can include the use of a variable size electrode. For example, an electrode may be used that, in one configuration has a relatively small diameter, which is used for minimally invasive implantation of the electrode into the site to be treated. Once inserted, a sheath or other covering can be retracted to allow expansion of the electrode tip to a different size for application of the electric field. After treatment, the sheath can be moved to cover the tip again, thus reducing the size of the tip to its original size, and the electrode withdrawn from the treated tissue. The expandable element can be thought of as a balloon structure, which can have varying diameters and shapes, depending on original material shape and size.

In addition to treatment of brain tumors using non-thermal IRE, the methods of the invention further comprise administration of an exogenous agent to the animal, so that it is present in blood to provide for uptake of the agent into a volume of brain tissue surrounding the treated brain tumor. The surrounding tissue is exposed to the exogenous agent as a result of a period of disruption of the BBB in tissue surrounding ablated tumor tissue. This period of disruption is reversible such that the BBB will eventually be restored after the cessation of IRE. As such, exogenous agents such as bioactive or diagnostic agents can be introduced into the surrounding tissue during the period in which the BBB is disrupted. Such a treatment is preferred when treating highly aggressive malignant tumors, which often show invasion of healthy tissue surrounding the tumor. In embodiments, the agent is administered to the subject parenterally.

The exogenous agent can be administered before, during, or after the EBT protocol (such as IRE) to provide an effective concentration of agent in the blood stream surrounding the volume of brain tissue during the period in which the BBB is disrupted. The exogenous agent may be a bioactive (e.g. therapeutic) agent of a diagnostic agent. The timing of administration of the exogenous agent can be determined by such factors as the pharmacokinetics of the agent according to the particularly route of administration in which the agent is administered. One of the advantages of the invention is that is not necessary to administer the exogenous agent through a local administration in the vicinity of the tumor to be treated, such as intrathecal; since the methods of the invention provide for disruption of the BBB, the exogenous agent may be administered systemically. For example, for an exogenous agent with a particularly short half-life, it may be desirable to administer the agent shortly before the IRE protocol through a route of administration that achieves rapid equilibration in the blood stream, such as intravenous administration. Typically, the route of administration is chosen based on the properties of the exogenous agent such as physicochemical characteristics, stability, and metabolism (e.g. half-life). Preferred are parenteral routes such as intravenous, intraarterial, intradermal, transdermal, intranasal, intraperitoneal, intramuscular, or buccal routes. Alternatively, administration may be the oral route or by application to mucous membranes. Preferably, the exogenous agent is administered so that it rapidly reaches the systemic circulation and thus the blood stream surrounding the volume of brain tissue to be treated. For an intravenous administration, the exogenous agent may be administered 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 0.5 hr, 1 hr, 2 hr, 4 hr, 8 hr, or 12 hr before the IRE protocol, depending on the type of exogenous agent used. For oral administration, the exogenous agent may be administered 12 hr, 24 hr, 36 hr, or 48 hr before the IRE protocol, depending for example on the rate of absorption of the exogenous agent. Preferably, the timing of administration of the exogenous agent is a such that it achieves C_(max) (maximum (or peak) concentration) in blood after dosing at the time of the IRE protocol or within a short period of time after the IRE protocol, such as within 10, 20, 30, 45, or 60 minutes after the IRE protocol. This is because the duration of BBB disruption, as the Examples show, in embodiments may be on the order of minutes. However, it may be possible to extend this duration of BBB disruption by using higher voltages, or changing other parameters of the treatment. In other embodiments, when the exogenous agent is a bioactive (therapeutic) agent, it may be desired to administer multiple doses of the bioactive agent to build up a therapeutic concentration of the bioactive agent in blood. Additionally or alternatively, it may be desired to perform several doses of the EBT and/or administering of the exogenous agent to ensure an appropriate level of treatment is achieved. As approved bioactive agents such as cancer therapeutic agents undergo rigorous pharmacokinetic testing prior to approval, the skilled artisan may rely on such data to determine an appropriate dosage, route of administration, and timing of administration of the bioactive agent to provide a therapeutic concentration of the agent in blood during the duration of blood-brain-barrier disruption.

Additionally or alternatively there could be instances in which some of the potential adverse effects (e.g. edema) of BBB disruption may be treated with corticosteroids, mannitol, vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF), chemical surfactants (e.g. neutral dextran), calcium channel blockers (e.g. nifedipine or verapamil), and/or amphiphilic tri-block copolymers (e.g. Poloxamer 188 (P188)).

The exogenous agent may be a small molecule, a radioisotope, a natural protein, a synthetic protein, a natural peptide, synthetic peptide, a peptidomimetic, an antibody, an antibody fragment, an antibody conjugate, a nucleic acid such as small interfering RNA (siRNA), antisense RNA, an aptamer, a ribozyme, or oligonucleotide, a viral vector comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a natural or synthetic bioactive protein peptide or serving as a vaccine to stimulate the immune system, or an engineered cell comprising such a viral vector. Preferably, the exogenous agent is a bioactive (e.g. therapeutic) agent comprising any of the above. As used herein, “bioactive agent” may also include a combination therapy employing two or more of any of the above, such as two or more small molecule therapies, a small molecule in combination with an antibody, a small molecule in combination with a viral vector, or any other combination.

In another aspect, the bioactive agent is a cancer therapeutic agent. In one embodiment, the bioactive agent is at least one cancer therapeutic agent selected from the group consisting of a chemotherapy agent, a targeted cancer therapy agent, a differentiating therapy agent, a hormone therapy agent, and an immunotherapy agent. Chemotherapy agents include alkylating agents, antimetabolites, anti-tumor antibiotics, topoisomerase inhibitors, mitotic inhibitors, corticosteroids, and the like. Targeted cancer therapy agents include signal transduction inhibitors (e.g. tyrosine kinase and growth factor receptor inhibitors), histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors, retinoic receptor agonists, proteosome inhibitors, angiogenesis inhibitors, and monoclonal antibody conjugates. Differentiating therapy agents include retinoids, such as tretinoin and bexarotene. Hormone therapy agents include anti-estrogens, aromatase inhibitors, progestins, estrogens, anti-androgens, and GnRH agonists or analogs. Immunotherapy agents include monoclonal antibody therapies such as rituximab (RITUXAN) and alemtuzumab (CAMPATH), non-specific immunotherapies and adjuvants, such as BCG, interleukin-2 (IL-2), and interferon-alfa, immunomodulating drugs, for instance, thalidomide and lenalidomide (REVLIMID), and cancer vaccines such as PROVENGE. It is within the capabilities of a skilled artisan to chose an appropriate cancer therapeutic agent in the methods of the invention based on characteristics such as the type of tumor (e.g. primary brain tumor or metastatic), stage of the tumor, previous exposure to cancer therapeutic agents, and molecular characteristics. However, there should be a basis to believe that its efficacy for treating tumor cells will be enhanced by disruption of the BBB. For example, the skilled artisan would have a basis to choose an antibody therapeutic or chemotherapy agent with a large molecular weight such as TAXOL based on exclusion of such macromolecules by the BBB when it is normally intact. Similarly, other cancer therapeutic agents could be chosen based on a water or lipid solubility incompatible with BBB permeability.

In another embodiment, the bioactive agent is at least one cancer therapeutic agent selected from the group consisting of Abiraterone Acetate, ABITREXATE (Methotrexate), ABRAXANE (Paclitaxel Albumin-stabilized Nanoparticle Formulation), ADCETRIS (Brentuximab Vedotin), Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine, ADRIAMYCIN (Doxorubicin Hydrochloride), ADRUCIL (Fluorouracil), Afatinib Dimaleate, AFINITOR (Everolimus), ALDARA (Imiquimod), Aldesleukin, Alemtuzumab, ALIMTA (Pemetrexed Disodium), ALOXI (Palonosetron Hydrochloride), AMBOCHLORIN (Chlorambucil), AMBOCLORIN (Chlorambucil), Aminolevulinic Acid, Anastrozole, Aprepitant, AREDIA (Pamidronate Disodium), ARIMIDEX (Anastrozole), AROMASIN (Exemestane), ARRANON (Nelarabine), Arsenic Trioxide, ARZERRA (Ofatumumab), Asparaginase Erwinia chrysanthemi, AVASTIN (Bevacizumab), Axitinib, Azacitidine, Bendamustine Hydrochloride, Bevacizumab, Bexarotene, BEXXAR (Tositumomab and I 131 Iodine Tositumomab), Bleomycin, Bortezomib, BOSULIF (Bosutinib), Cabazitaxel, Cabozantinib-S-Malate, CAMPATH (Alemtuzumab), CAMPTOSAR (Irinotecan Hydrochloride), Capecitabine, Carboplatin, Carfilzomib, CEENU (Lomustine), CERUBIDINE (Daunorubicin Hydrochloride), Cetuximab, Chlorambucil, Cisplatin, CLAFEN (Cyclophosphamide), Clofarabine, COMETRIQ (Cabozantinib-S-Malate), COSMEGEN (Dactinomycin), Crizotinib, Cyclophosphamide, CYFOS (Ifosfamide), Cytarabine, Dabrafenib, Dacarbazine, DACOGEN (Decitabine), Dactinomycin, Dasatinib, Daunorubicin Hydrochloride, Decitabine, Degarelix, Denileukin Diftitox, Denosumab, Dexrazoxane Hydrochloride, Docetaxel, Doxorubicin Hydrochloride, EFUDEX (Fluorouracil), ELITEK (Rasburicase), ELLENCE (Epirubicin Hydrochloride), ELOXATIN (Oxaliplatin), Eltrombopag Olamine, EMEND (Aprepitant), Enzalutamide, Epirubicin Hydrochloride, ERBITUX (Cetuximab), Eribulin Mesylate, ERIVEDGE (Vismodegib), Erlotinib Hydrochloride, ERWINAZE (Asparaginase Erwinia chrysanthemi), Etoposide, Everolimus, EVISTA (Raloxifene Hydrochloride), Exemestane, FARESTON (Toremifene), FASLODEX (Fulvestrant), FEMARA (Letrozole), Filgrastim, FLUDARA (Fludarabine Phosphate), Fludarabine Phosphate, FLUOROPLEX (Fluorouracil), Fluorouracil, FOLOTYN (Pralatrexate), Fulvestrant, Gefitinib, Gemcitabine Hydrochloride, Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin, GEMZAR (Gemcitabine Hydrochloride), GILOTRIF (Afatinib Dimaleate), GLEEVEC (Imatinib Mesylate), HALAVEN (Eribulin Mesylate), HERCEPTIN (Trastuzumab), HYCAMTIN (Topotecan Hydrochloride), Ibritumomab Tiuxetan, ICLUSIG (Ponatinib Hydrochloride), Ifosfamide, Imatinib Mesylate, Imiquimod, INLYTA (Axitinib), INTRON A (Recombinant Interferon Alfa-2b), Iodine 131 Tositumomab and Tositumomab, Ipilimumab, IRESSA (Gefitinib), Irinotecan Hydrochloride, ISTODAX (Romidepsin), Ixabepilone, JAKAFI (Ruxolitinib Phosphate), JEVTANA (Cabazitaxel), Kadcyla (Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine), KEOXIFENE (Raloxifene Hydrochloride), KEPIVANCE (Palifermin), KYPROLIS (Carfilzomib), Lapatinib Ditosylate, Lenalidomide, Letrozole, Leucovorin Calcium, Leuprolide Acetate, Lomustine, LUPRON (Leuprolide Acetate, MARQIBO (Vincristine Sulfate Liposome), MATULANE (Procarbazine Hydrochloride), Mechlorethamine Hydrochloride, MEGACE (Megestrol Acetate), Megestrol Acetate, MEKINIST (Trametinib), Mercaptopurine, Mesna, METHAZOLASTONE (Temozolomide), Methotrexate, Mitomycin, MOZOBIL (Plerixafor), MUSTARGEN (Mechlorethamine Hydrochloride), MUTAMYCIN (Mitomycin C), MYLOSAR (Azacitidine), MYLOTARG (Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin), Nanoparticle Paclitaxel (Paclitaxel Albumin-stabilized Nanoparticle Formulation), NAVELBINE (Vinorelbine Tartrate), Nelarabine, NEOSAR (Cyclophosphamide), NEUPOGEN (Filgrastim), NEXAVAR (Sorafenib Tosylate), Nilotinib, NOLVADEX (Tamoxifen Citrate), NPLATE (Romiplostim), Ofatumumab, Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate, ONCASPAR (Pegaspargase), ONTAK (Denileukin Diftitox), Oxaliplatin, Paclitaxel, Paclitaxel Albumin-stabilized Nanoparticle Formulation, Palifermin, Palonosetron Hydrochloride, Pamidronate Disodium, Panitumumab, Pazopanib Hydrochloride, Pegaspargase, Peginterferon Alfa-2b, PEG-INTRON (Peginterferon Alfa-2b), Pemetrexed Disodium, Pertuzumab, PLATINOL (Cisplatin), PLATINOL-AQ (Cisplatin), Plerixafor, Pomalidomide, POMALYST (Pomalidomide), Ponatinib Hydrochloride, Pralatrexate, Prednisone, Procarbazine Hydrochloride, PROLEUKIN (Aldesleukin), PROLIA (Denosumab), PROMACTA (Eltrombopag Olamine), PROVENGE (Sipuleucel-T), PURINETHOL (Mercaptopurine), Radium 223 Dichloride, Raloxifene Hydrochloride, Rasburicas, Recombinant Interferon Alfa-2b, Regorafenib, REVLIMID (Lenalidomide), RHEUMATREX (Methotrexate), Rituximab, Romidepsin, Romiplostim, RUBIDOMYCIN (Daunorubicin Hydrochloride), Ruxolitinib Phosphat, Sipuleucel-T, Sorafenib Tosylate, SPRYCEL (Dasatinib), STIVARGA (Regorafenib), Sunitinib Malate, SUTENT (Sunitinib Malate), SYLATRON (Peginterferon Alfa-2b), SYNOVIR (Thalidomide), SYNRIBO (Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate), TAFINLAR (Dabrafenib), Tamoxifen Citrate, TARABINE PFS (Cytarabine), TARCEVA (Erlotinib Hydrochloride), TARGRETIN (Bexarotene), TASIGNA (Nilotinib), TAXOL (Paclitaxel), TAXOTERE (Docetaxel), TEMODAR (Temozolomide), Temozolomide, Temsirolimus, Thalidomide, TOPOSAR (Etoposide), Topotecan Hydrochloride, Toremifene, TORISEL (Temsirolimus), Tositumomab and I 131 Iodine Tositumomab, TOTECT (Dexrazoxane Hydrochloride), Trametinib, Trastuzumab, TREANDA (Bendamustine Hydrochloride), TRISENOX (Arsenic Trioxide), TYKERB (Lapatinib Ditosylate), Vandetanib, VECTIBIX (Panitumumab), VeIP, VELBAN (Vinblastine Sulfate), VELCADE (Bortezomib), VELSAR (Vinblastine Sulfate), Vemurafenib, VEPESID (Etoposide), VIADUR (Leuprolide Acetate), VIDAZA (Azacitidine), Vinblastine Sulfate, Vincristine Sulfate, Vinorelbine Tartrate, Vismodegib, VORAXAZE (Glucarpidase), Vorinostat, VOTRIENT (Pazopanib Hydrochloride), WELLCOVORIN (Leucovorin Calcium), XALKORI (Crizotinib), XELODA (Capecitabine), XGEVA (Denosumab), XOFIGO (Radium 223 Dichloride), XTANDI (Enzalutamide), YERVOY (Ipilimumab), ZALTRAP (Ziv-Aflibercept), ZELBORAF (Vemurafenib), ZEVALIN (Ibritumomab Tiuxetan), ZINECARD (Dexrazoxane Hydrochloride), Ziv-Aflibercept, Zoledronic Acid, ZOLINZA (Vorinostat), ZOMETA (Zoledronic Acid), and ZYTIGA (Abiraterone Acetate), including any formulation (e.g. liposomal, pegylated) or any brand name of any generic agent included herein.

In another embodiment, the bioactive agent is a combination of cancer therapeutic agents. Combinations of cancer therapeutic agents that are efficacious when combined are known. The following is a non-limiting list of combinations of cancer therapeutic agents that may be included as the bioactive agent (capital letters representing initialisms and acronyms refer to combinations rather than brand names): ABVD, ABVE, ABVE-PC, AC, AC-T, ADE, BEACOPP, BEP, CAF, CAPDX, CARBOPLATIN-TAXOL, CHLORAMBUCIL-PREDNISONE, CHOP, CMF, COPP, COPP-ABV, CVP, EPOCH, FEC, FOLFIRI, FOLFIRI-BEVACIZUMAB, FOLFIRI-CETUXIMAB, FOLFIRINOX, FOLFOX, FU-LV, GEMCITABINE-CISPLATIN, ICE, MOPP, R-CHOP, R-CVP, STANFORD V, VAMP, VeIP, and XELOX. These initialisms and acronyms representing combination cancer therapies are well known in the art and need not be defined here.

The bioactive agent or agents may be administered alone or with suitable pharmaceutical carriers. Preparations for parenteral, as well as local administration, include sterile aqueous or non-aqueous solutions, suspensions and emulsions, which may contain auxiliary agents or excipients which are known in the art and which may facilitate processing of the bioactive agents into preparations which can be used pharmaceutically. Pharmaceutical compositions, such as tablets and capsules can also be prepared according to routine methods.

Suitable formulations for administration include aqueous solutions of the bioactive agents in water-soluble form, for example, water-soluble salts. In addition, suspension of the bioactive agents as appropriate oily injection suspensions may be administered. Suitable lipophilic solvents or vehicles include fatty oils, for example, sesame oil, or synthetic fatty esters, for example, ethyl oleate or triglycerides. Aqueous injection suspensions that may contain substances which increase the viscosity of the suspension include, for example, sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, sorbitol and/or dextran. Optionally, the suspension may also contain stabilizers.

The bioactive agent also may be orally administered, for example, with an inert diluent, or with an assimilable edible carrier, or they may be enclosed in hard or soft shell capsules, or they may be compressed into tablets, or they may be incorporated directly with the food of the diet. For oral therapeutic administration, the bioactive agents may be incorporated with excipients and used in the form of tablets, capsules, elixirs, suspensions, syrups, and the like. Such compositions and preparations should contain at least 0.1% of active compound. The percentage of the compound in these compositions may, of course, be varied and may conveniently be between about 2% to about 60% of the weight of the unit. The amount of active compound in such therapeutically useful compositions is such that a suitable dosage is obtained. Preferred compositions according to the present invention are prepared so that an oral dosage unit contains between about 1 and 250 mg of active compound.

The tablets, capsules, and the like may also contain a binder such as gum tragacanth, acacia, corn starch, or gelatin; excipients such as dicalcium phosphate; a disintegrating agent such as corn starch, potato starch, alginic acid; a lubricant such as magnesium stearate; and a sweetening agent such as sucrose, lactose, or saccharin. When the dosage unit form is a capsule, it may contain, in addition to materials of the above type, a liquid carrier, such as a fatty oil.

Various other materials may be present as coatings or to modify the physical form of the dosage unit. For instance, tablets may be coated with shellac, sugar, or both. A syrup may contain, in addition to active ingredient, sucrose as a sweetening agent, methyl and propylparabens as preservatives, a dye, and flavoring such as cherry or orange flavor.

In another aspect, the exogenous agent is a diagnostic agent. The diagnostic agent may be a contrast agent, such as a radioactive or colored marker, or any other means or substance capable of revealing a metabolism or pathology of the central nervous system through imaging or biopsy. Preferably, the diagnostic agent is one that indicates abnormal cell proliferation indicative of cancer. The diagnostic agent may be used in the invention as a market to indicate the efficacy of therapeutic treatments. For example, a signal indicating proliferation in the area surrounding a zone of ablation may indicate the need for additional rounds of treatment with cancer therapeutic agents. If the tumor itself is completed destroyed through IRE, additional rounds of treatment can employ reversible electroporation or blood-brain-barrier disruption surrounding the zone of ablation to spare healthy tissue in the vicinity of the tumor, and provide for disruption of the blood-barrier in the vicinity of the tumor (e.g., surrounding the zone of ablation) to allow for uptake of cancer therapeutic agents to treat infiltrating tumor cells.

In clinical settings, methods according to the invention can have ameliorative effects or curative effects. That is, a method can provide a reduction in cell growth of a tumor, a reduction in tumor size, or total ablation of the tumor. Further, the methods can provide for partial or complete elimination of tumor cells surrounding a zone of ablation. Total ablation of a tumor and complete elimination of infiltrating tumor cells in tissue surrounding the treated tumor may result in a curative effect.

Exemplary methods of the invention can include a single round of treatment or two or more rounds of treatment. That is, the methods of cell ablation, either intentionally or as a result of tumor size or shape, can result in less than complete destruction of a tumor. In such a situation, the methods can be repeated one or more times to effect the desired level of tumor reduction or killing of tumor cells surrounding the destructed tumor. As methods of the invention are relatively minimally invasive, multiple rounds of treatment are not as harmful to the patient as multiple rounds of traditional surgical intervention. Multiple rounds of administering EBT may be useful in prolonging the amount of time the blood-brain-barrier is disrupted to allow for the desired amount of exogenous agent to cross the barrier.

Methods of the invention can be part of a multi-modal treatment. The methods thus may comprise other cell-killing techniques known in the art. For example, the methods may further comprise exposing the tumor, or area surrounding the tumor, to radiation. It likewise may be performed after or between surgical intervention to remove all or part of a tumor.

According to embodiments, methods of the invention can be implemented in part using electroporation devices and systems. The electroporation devices according to the invention are suitable for minimally invasive temporary implantation into a patient, emission of a tissue-ablating level of an electrical field in combination with administration of an exogenous agent, and removal from the patient. The electroporation device according to the invention thus may be used in the treatment of tumors and infiltrating tumor cells and the treatment of patients suffering from tumors. The electroporation devices can take multiple forms, based on the desired three-dimensional shape of the electrical field for cell killing. However, in general, the electroporation devices include two or more electrically conducting regions.

Further, in general, the electroporation device takes a rod-like shape, with one dimension (i.e., length) being substantially longer than the other (i.e., width or diameter). While exemplary embodiments are configured in a generally cylindrical shape, it is to be understood that the cross-sectional shape of the electrode can take any suitable geometric shape. It thus may be circular, square, rectangular, oval, elliptical, triangular, pentagonal, hexagonal, octagonal, or any other shape.

The electroporation devices of the invention comprise one or more electrodes, which are electrically conductive portions of the device, or one or more ground electrode. The electroporation devices thus comprise electrically conductive elements suitable for temporary implantation into living tissue that are capable of delivering an electrical pulse to the living tissue. The electroporation device of the invention has a proximal end and a distal end. The proximal end is defined as the end at which the electroporation device is attached to one or more other elements, for control of the function of the device. The distal end is defined by the end that contacts target tissue and delivers electrical pulses to the tissue. The distal end thus comprises an exposed or exposable electrically conductive material for implantation into a target tissue. Typically, the distal end is described as including a “tip” to denote the region of the distal end from which an electrical pulse is delivered to a tissue. The device further comprises at least one surface defining the length and circumference of the device.

In exemplary embodiments, the electroporation device comprises a laminate structure, with alternating conductive and non-conductive or insulative layers expanding outward from the proximal-distal center axis to the surface of the device. In typical embodiments, the center most layer, which shows the smallest diameter or width, is electrically conductive and comprises a part of the electrode tip. However, in alternative embodiments, the center-most layer is an open channel through which a fluid may be passed or through which additional physical elements may be placed. Yet again, the center-most layer may comprise an insulative material. In embodiments comprising a laminate structure, the structure can provide a more customizable electric field distribution by varying the separation distances between electrically conductive regions. Alternatively, in embodiments, certain electrically conductive regions can be exposed or concealed by movement of an outer, non-conductive sheath. In embodiments that do not comprise a laminate structure, the separation lengths can be achieved by disposing on the surface non-conductive materials at various regions.

Hollow Core Device

Many IRE treatments may involve coupled procedures, incorporating several discrete aspects during the same treatment. One embodiment of the invention provides a device with a needle-like tip 910 with an incorporated hollow needle 990 with either an end outlet 991 (shown in Panel A) or mixed dispersion regions 961 (shown in Panel B). Such a configuration allows for highly accurate distribution of injectable solutions, including those comprising bioactive agents. Use of such a device limits the dose of treatment required as well as ensures the correct placement of the materials prior to, during, and/or after the treatment. Some of the possible treatment enhancers that would benefit from this technology are: single or multi-walled carbon nanotubes (CNTs); chemotherapeutic agents; conductive gels to homogenize the electric field; antibiotics; anti-inflammatories; anaesthetics; muscle relaxers; nerve relaxers; or any other substance of interest.

The schematics in FIG. 1 show two basic hollow needle designs that may be implemented to enhance solution delivery prior to, during, or after IRE treatment. They both have multiple conducting surfaces 920 that may act as charged electrodes, grounded electrodes, or electric resistors, depending on the treatment protocol. Panel A shows a hollow tip 910 for injection of agents at its end while Panel B has distributed pores 961 throughout for a more generalized agent distribution. As shown in Panel B, the pores are disposed in the non-conducting regions 930 of the device.

Device with Movable Outer Sheath

In embodiments, the device comprises an outer protector that is designed to be movable up and down along the length of the device. FIG. 2 depicts such a movable outer protector. More specifically, FIG. 2 depicts a device 1000 comprising tip 1010 that includes outer protector 1062 that can be moved up and down along the length of device 1000. In practice, outer protector 1062 is disposed fully or partially encasing outer sheath 1060. After or during insertion into tissue to be treated, outer protector 1062 is retracted partially to expose outer sheath 1060, which in the embodiment depicted comprises mixed dispersion outlets 1061. As such, the number of dispersion outlets 1061 exposed to the tissue during treatment can be adjusted to deliver varying amounts of bioactive agent to different portions of the tissue being treated. Any mechanism for movement of the outer sheath along the device may be used. In embodiments, screw threads are disposed on the upper portion of the device, allowing for easy adjustment by simple twisting of the outer sheath. Alternatively, set screws may be disposed in the outer sheath, allowing for locking of the sheath in place after adjustment.

In some embodiments, one or more substantially open channels are disposed along the center axis or in place of one of the conductive or insulative layers. The channel(s) may be used as heat sinks for heat produced by the device during use. In embodiments, water or another fluid is held or entrained in the channel to absorb and/or remove heat.

The electroporation device of the invention comprises an electrode tip at the distal end. The electrode tip functions to deliver electrical pulses to target tissue. The tip may be represented by a single conductive layer of the device or may be represented by two or more conductive layers that are exposed to the tissue to be treated. Furthermore, the tip may be designed to have any number of geometrical shapes. Exemplary embodiments include tips having a needle-like shape (i.e., electrical pulses emanate from a small cone-like structure at the distal end of the device) or having a circular shape (i.e., electrical pulses emanate from the cylindrical outer surface of the device, which is a section of the device where the outer insulative layer has been removed to expose the next layer, which is conductive). For use in treatment of brain tumors, the tip advantageously comprises a blunt or rounded end to minimize laceration of brain tissue. In embodiments, the rounded or blunt end comprises a hole that allows for a sharp or needle-like structure to be deployed into tumor tissue.

The electroporation device comprises a proximal end, which generally functions for attachment of the device to a power source/controller and a handle. The proximal end thus may comprise connections for electrical wires that run from the power source/controller to the electrically conductive layers of the device. Standard electrical connections may be used to connect the conductive elements to the wires. In embodiments, the device is attached to a handle for ease of use by a human. While not limited in the means for attaching the device to the handle, in embodiments, the connection is made by way of a friction fit between the outer surface of the device and the handle, for example by way of an insulative O-ring (e.g., a Norprene O-ring) on the handle. In other embodiments, the device comprises, on its outer surface, ridges or other surface features that mate with surface features present on the handle. In yet other embodiments, the proximal end comprises one or more structures that allow for controlled movement of the outer surface along the length of the device. In such embodiments, the outer surface will comprise an outer sheath that is electrically non-conductive, and which surrounds an electrically conductive layer. Using the structures at the proximal end, the outer sheath may be moved, relative to the rest of the device, to expose or conceal varying portions of the electrically conductive material beneath it. In this way, the amount of surface area of the conductive material at the tip can be adjusted to provide a desired height of exposure of tissue to the electrode tip. Of course, other structures for securely fastening the device to a holder may be used, such as clips, set screws, pins, and the like. The device is not limited by the type of structure used to connect the device to the holder.

The electroporation device (such as the probes or electrodes) of the invention can be designed to have any desired size. Typically, it is designed to be minimally invasive yet at the same time suitable for delivery of an effective electrical field for IRE. The diameter or width of the probes or electrodes is thus on the order of 0.5 mm to 1 cm. Preferably, the diameter or width is about 0.5 mm to about 5 mm, such as about 1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm, or 4 mm. The length of the device is not particularly limited, but is generally set such that a surgeon can use the device comfortably to treat tumors at any position in the body. Thus, for human use, the electroporation device is typically on the order of 40 cm or less in length, such as about 30 cm, 25 cm, or 15 cm, whereas for veterinary use, the length can be much larger, depending on the size of animal to be treated. For treatment of human brain tumors, the length can be on the order of 40 cm.

In some embodiments, the device, or a portion of it, is flexible. A flexible device is advantageous for use in accessing tumors non-invasively or minimally invasively through natural body cavities. In embodiments where the device or a portion of it is flexible, the shape of the device can change based on contact with body tissues, can be pre-set, or can be altered in real-time through use of wires or other control elements, as known in the art, for example in use with laparoscopic instruments.

The electroporation device of the invention can be part of a system. In addition to the device, the system can comprise a handle into or onto which the device is disposed. The handle can take any of a number of shapes, but is generally designed to allow a surgeon to use the device of the invention to treat a patient in need. It thus typically has a connector for connecting the device to the holder, and a structure for the surgeon to grasp and maneuver the device. The handle further can comprise a trigger or other mechanism that allows the surgeon to control delivery of electrical pulses to the device, and thus to the tissue to be treated. The trigger can be a simple on/off switch or can comprise a variable control that allows for control of the amount of power to be delivered to the device. Additionally, the handle may be created in such a manner that it may be attached to additional pieces of equipment, such as ones that allow precise placement of the electrode relative to an inertial or the patient's frame of reference, allowing steady and accurate electrode positioning throughout an entire procedure, which may entail the application of electric pulses in addition to radiotherapy, imaging, and injections (systemically and locally) of bioactive agents. Furthermore, the handle may be attached to machines that are operated remotely by practitioners (e.g., the Da Vinci machine).

The system can further comprise a power source and/or a power control unit. In embodiments, the power source and control unit are the same object. The power source provides electrical power to the device, typically by way of an electrical connection through the handle. The power source can be any suitable source that can deliver the proper amount of electrical power to the device of the invention. Suitable power sources are commercially available, and the invention is not limited by the type or manufacturer. The power control unit provides the user with the ability to set the power output and pulse time for electrical pulses to be delivered to the device, and thus to the tissue to be treated. Suitable control units are commercially available, and the invention is not limited by the type or manufacturer. For example, an appropriate power source/controller is available from Angiodynamics (Queensbury, N.Y.).

The electroporation device of the invention can be disposable or reusable. Where the device is designed to be reusable, it is preferably fabricated from materials that can be sterilized multiple times without destruction of the device. For example, the electroporation device can be fabricated from rust-resistant metals or alloys, such as stainless steel, and plastic or other synthetic polymeric materials that can withstand cleaning and sterilization. Exemplary materials are those that can be subjected to detergents, steam heat (e.g., autoclaving), and/or irradiation for at least one cycle of sterilization. Those of skill in the art can select the appropriate materials without undue experimentation, based on materials used in other medical devices designed to withstand common sterilization techniques.

One embodiment of a system for use in the methods of the present invention is illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 4. The components used with the present invention are illustrated in FIG. 3. One or more probes 22 deliver therapeutic energy and are powered by a voltage pulse generator 10 that generates high voltage pulses as therapeutic energy such as pulses capable of irreversibly electroporating the tissue cells. In the embodiment shown, the voltage pulse generator 10 includes six separate receptacles for receiving up to six individual probes 22 which are adapted to be plugged into the respective receptacle. The receptacles are each labeled with a number in consecutive order. In other embodiments, the voltage pulse generator can have any number of receptacles for receiving more or less than six probes.

In the embodiment shown, each probe 22 includes either a monopolar electrode or bipolar electrodes having two electrodes separated by an insulating sleeve. In one embodiment, if the probe includes a monopolar electrode, the amount of exposure of the active portion of the electrode can be adjusted by retracting or advancing an insulating sleeve relative to the electrode. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,344,533, which is incorporated by reference herein. The generator 10 is connected to a treatment control computer 40 having input devices such as keyboard 12 and a pointing device 14, and an output device such as a display device 11 for viewing an image of a target treatment area such as a brain tumor 300 surrounded by a tumor margin 301. The therapeutic energy delivery device 22 is used to treat a brain tumor 300 inside a patient 15. An imaging device 30 includes a monitor 31 for viewing the brain tumor 300 inside the patient 15 in real time. Examples of imaging devices 30 include ultrasonic, CT, MRI and fluoroscopic devices as are known in the art.

The system optionally includes medical equipment for administering a cancer therapeutic agent to the patient 15. In one embodiment, the equipment includes an IV bag 70 filled with a solution of the cancer therapeutic agent, a programmable infusion pump 75, and an IV line 81 for delivering the cancer therapeutic agent to the patient 15 into a vein of the patient 15, such as through a catheter, a central venous catheter, or a port. However, such embodiment is illustrative only, as the cancer therapeutic agent need not be administered intravenously. The cancer therapeutic agent can be administered to the patient 15 to treat tumor cells at the tumor margin 301.

The system of the present invention includes computer software (treatment planning module 54) which assists a user to plan for, execute, and review the results of a medical treatment procedure, as will be discussed in more detail below. For example, the treatment planning module 54 assists a user to plan for a medical treatment procedure by enabling a user to more accurately position each of the probes 22 of the therapeutic energy delivery device 20 in relation to the brain tumor 300 in a way that will generate the most effective treatment zone. The treatment planning module 54 can display the anticipated treatment zone based on the position of the probes and the treatment parameters. The treatment planning module 54 can display the progress of the treatment in real time and can display the results of the treatment procedure after it is completed. This information can be used to determine whether the treatment was successful and whether it is desired to re-treat or further treat the patient.

For purposes of this application, the terms “code”, “software”, “program”, “application”, “software code”, “computer readable code”, “software module”, “module” and “software program” are used interchangeably to mean software instructions that are executable by a processor. The “user” can be a physician or other medical professional. The treatment planning module 54 executed by a processor outputs various data including text and graphical data to the monitor 11 associated with the generator 10.

Referring now to FIG. 4, the treatment control computer 40 of the present invention manages planning of treatment for a patient. The computer 40 is connected to the communication link 52 through an I/O interface 42 such as a USB (universal serial bus) interface, which receives information from and sends information over the communication link 52 to the voltage generator 10. The computer 40 includes memory storage 44 such as RAM, processor (CPU) 46, program storage 48 such as ROM or EEPROM, and data storage 50 such as a hard disk, all commonly connected to each other through a bus 53. The program storage 48 stores, among others, a treatment planning module 54 which includes a user interface module that interacts with the user in planning for, executing and reviewing the result of a treatment. Any of the software program modules in the program storage 48 and data from the data storage 50 can be transferred to the memory 44 as needed and is executed by the CPU 46.

In one embodiment, the computer 40 is built into the voltage generator 10. In another embodiment, the computer 40 is a separate unit which is connected to the voltage generator through the communications link 52. In a preferred embodiment, the communication link 52 is a USB link. In one embodiment, the imaging device 30 is a standalone device which is not connected to the computer 40. In the embodiment as shown in FIG. 3, the computer 40 is connected to the imaging device 30 through a communications link 53. As shown, the communication link 53 is a USB link. In this embodiment, the computer can determine the size and orientation of the brain tumor 300 by analyzing the data such as the image data received from the imaging device 30, and the computer 40 can display this information on the monitor 11. In this embodiment, the lesion image generated by the imaging device 30 can be directly displayed on the grid (not shown) of the display device (monitor) 11 of the computer running the treatment planning module 54. This embodiment would provide an accurate representation of the lesion image on the grid, and may eliminate the step of manually inputting the dimensions of the lesion in order to create the lesion image on the grid. This embodiment would also be useful to provide an accurate representation of the lesion image if the lesion has an irregular shape.

It should be noted that the software can be used independently of the generator 10. For example, the user can plan the treatment in a different computer as will be explained below and then save the treatment parameters to an external memory device, such as a USB flash drive (not shown). The data from the memory device relating to the treatment parameters can then be downloaded into the computer 40 to be used with the generator 10 for treatment.

The present invention may be further illustrated by the foregoing Examples, which are intended to demonstrate certain principles and features of the invention rather than limit the scope of any claim.

EXAMPLES Materials and Methods

In Vivo Irreversible Electroporation Protocol

The following example was performed with approval from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the Wake Forest University School of Medicine. Twenty-one male Fischer rats, weighing 190-220 g, were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of 10 mg/kg xylazine and 60 mg/kg ketamine. The head was clipped and prepared for aseptic surgery. Rats were immobilized in a small animal stereotactic headframe (Model 1350M, David Kopf Instruments, Tungisten, Calif., USA). A lateral rostrotentorial surgical approach was made and an 8 mm×3 mm rectangular, parieto-occipital craniectomy defect was created in the right aspect of the skull using a high-speed Dremel drill. Custom, blunt-tipped IRE caliper electrodes were advanced into the cerebral cortex using stereotactic coordinates referenced to the location of the rostral electrode (bregma 4 mm posterior, 3.5 mm lateral, 1.5 mm dorsoventral). The caliper electrodes used were 0.45 mm in diameter, had 1 mm exposure, and were 4 mm in edge-to-edge separation distance.

The two-electrode configuration used generates a non-uniform electric field distribution that depends on the applied voltage and dielectric properties of the tissue. Accordingly, voltage-to-distance ratios are referred to in order to enable other researchers with the IRE pulse parameters used. Animals underwent IRE treatment according to parameters in Table 1.

TABLE 1 IRE Pulse parameters and Evan's Blue/Gd administration schedule used. 800 1000 Time (min) 0 V/cm 200 V/cm 400 V/cm 600 V/cm V/cm V/cm −5 † * † * † * † * † * +5 * * * * * +15 * * * +30 * * * † = Evan's Blue (n = 5); * = Gadolinium (n = 16) (Magnevist ®). A separate animal was used to assess each time point and electric field (n = 21).

To assess permeability of the BBB, Gd was administered to animals (n=16) in each electric field group at varying times before or after delivering ninety 50-μs IRE pulses at a rate of one pulse per second (Table 1). If desired, the material to be delivered can alternatively or in addition be administered during the electrical energy based procedure. Each animal received only a single contrast agent injection, with a separate animal being used to assess each time point and applied electric field. The control (sham) animals had the electrodes inserted into the brain but no pulses were delivered. One animal (n=5) in each electric field group received Evan's Blue (50 mg/kg, IP) 5 minutes prior to IRE and was euthanized 30 minutes after pulse delivery without being subjected to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination. Disruption of BBB, visible on histological sections in the animals was compared to the contrast-enhanced regions observed using MRI.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

A 7.0-T small animal MRI scanner (Bruker Biospec 70/30, Ettlingen, Germany) was used. Body temperature was maintained during scanning with thermostatically-controlled warm air. The heart rate, respiratory rate, and temperature were telemetrically monitored during scanning. A 38 mm inner diameter quadrature volume coil was used for RF signal transmission and reception (Litzcage, Doty Scientific, Columbia, S.C.). Sequence acquisition parameters were: T1-weighted (T1W) images were acquired using Rapid Acquisition with Relaxation Enhancement (RARE) pulse sequence with 8 echoes (TR=1440 ms, TE=7.5 ms, FOV=4 cm, matrix=256×256, slice thickness=0.5 mm, NEX=8), followed by the T2-weighted (T2W) images which were acquired using a RARE pulse sequence with 8 echoes (TR=6575 ms, TE=60 ms, FOV=4 cm, matrix=256×256, slice thickness=0.5 mm, NEX=8). T1W images were obtained following intraperitoneal administration of 0.1 mmol/kg of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist®: Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Wayne N.J.), but administration of the same or similar amount of gadobenate dimeglumine (Multihance: Bracco Diagnostics, Princeton, N.J.) can also be used. The contrast was injected in reference to the delivery of the electric pulses according to the schedule in Table 1.

MR images were obtained 5-15 minutes after contrast injection which is consistent with where most of the enhancement from an IP injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine occurs as shown by Howles et al. (Howles G P, Bing K F, Qi Y, Rosenzweig S J, Nightingale K R, et al. (2010) Contrast-enhanced in vivo magnetic resonance microscopy of the mouse brain enabled by noninvasive opening of the BBB with ultrasound. Magn Reson Med 64: 995-1004). Cross-sectional areas of contrast were contoured independently in a semi-automated manner on each slice of the T1W+Gd sequence, with volumes of contrast-enhancing tissue being calculated automatically with Mimics software 14.1 (Materialise, Leuven, BG). Because Gd is too large to cross the intact BBB in the cerebrum, any increase in contrast enhancement evident on T1W+Gd images, compared with levels of enhancement seen in the control animals, was taken as direct evidence of BBB disruption induced by IRE (Liu et al., 2010; Frigeni et al., 2001; Noce et al., 1999). T2W images were used to evaluate any edema surrounding the IRE ablated regions.

Contrast enhancement intensity was quantified using four reference tubes filled with known Gd concentrations (0, 0.09, 0.19, and 0.24 mg/ml) in saline and scanned with each rodent. A calibration curve was determined to allow for calculation of a normalized mean value of Gd concentration within the IRE-induced volume of BBB disruption (Hirschberg H, Zhang M J, Gach H M, Uzal F A, Peng Q, et al. (2009) Targeted delivery of bleomycin to the brain using photo-chemical internalization of Clostridium perfringens epsilon prototoxin. J Neurooncol 95: 317-329). Three mean intensity measurements within a 3.2 mm² circle were averaged along the reference tubes in order to minimize the intensity variations within each scan. These independent measurements were performed on MRI slices that corresponded with the rostral and caudal electrode insertions and one slice in-between the electrodes. The mean intensity of each 3D reconstructed lesion was divided by the mean intensity of the 0.09 mg/ml reference tube in order to normalize the Gd concentration across the different treatments. The normalized intensities were then converted to Gd concentrations and are provided in the results section.

Histopathology

An adult rat brain matrix slicer (Zivic Instruments, Pittsburgh, Pa.) was used to obtain contiguous 3.0 mm coronal brain sections of formalin fixed brains. Brain sections were paraffin embedded, sectioned at 5 μm, and stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H&E). Each microscopic brain section was photographed at 150× magnification using a digital camera (Nikon DS-Fi1, Nikon, Japan). For each treatment and time, 3 separate independent hand drawn regions of interest (ROI) were traced around the boundaries of the IRE zone of ablation present in the brain, and the area of each ROI determined using the area function of image analysis software (NIS-Elements AR, Nikon, Japan).

The ROI limits from which IRE zones of ablation were traced used the following anatomic boundaries: dorsal—dura mater, ventrolateral—inner limit of external capsule, ventromedial—inner limit of corpus callosum. Any intervening cerebrocortical tissue that was lesioned within these limits was included in the ROI. For sections in which IRE treatment resulted in a full thickness cerebrocortical defect or cavitation of tissue architecture, the lesion area was determined by subtracting the area of the cerebral hemisphere remaining intact on the IRE treated side of the brain (FIG. 6D-Y, dashed line) from the area of the contralateral (untreated; FIG. 6D-X, solid line) cerebral hemisphere. Cerebral hemispheric areas were determined from three separate hand-drawn ROI, using photomicrographs obtained at 50× magnification, as described above.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis on the effect of applied electric field and timing of Gd administration was conducted using JMP 9.0 (SAS, South Cary, N.C.) via Fit of Least Squares with α=0.05. Linear regression analysis of the relationship between electric field and volume of ablation was also performed as it was found appropriate using previously published data (Garcia P A, Rossmeisl J H, Jr., Neal R E, 2nd, Ellis T L, Davalos R V (2011) A Parametric Study Delineating Irreversible Electroporation from Thermal Damage Based on a Minimally Invasive Intracranial Procedure. Biomed Eng Online 10: 34).

Results

FIGS. 6A-6D are images showing histopathologic evaluations of IRE-induced effects determined with Hematoxylin and Eosin stain. Histopathologic sections of cerebral cortex from untreated control rat (FIG. 6A), sham treated rat with physical displacement of the neuropil in the trajectory of the electrode (FIG. 6B), and cortical ablation zone resulting from 800 V/cm IRE treatment (FIG. 6C). Histopathologic lesion area determination in presence of IRE induced cavitary cerebral defect (FIG. 6D). The IRE lesion area (mm²)=untreated cerebral area (X)−IRE lesioned cerebral area (Y). Bar=500 μm in FIGS. 6A-6C.

On gross examination of the brain (FIG. 6A), sham treatment resulted in two punctate, 1 mm cortical depressions corresponding to the points of electrode insertions. In histopathological sections, sham zones of ablation were characterized by physical displacement of the brain tissue along the electrode tracks and associated with microhemorrhage into the electrode tracks. Zones of ablation in sham-treated rats were limited to the immediate proximity of the electrode insertions, with the adjacent neuropil retaining normal cortical architecture and morphology (FIG. 6A). At voltage-to-distance ratios of 200 V/cm and 400 V/cm (FIG. 6B), observed gross and histopathological zones of ablation were morphologically indistinguishable from those of sham-treated rats. At voltage-to-distance ratios greater than 600 V/cm, IRE treatment resulted in distinct areas of parenchymal ablation (FIG. 6C). Grossly, ablated regions were malacic. Microscopically, IRE zones of ablation were characterized by an eosinophilic, vacuolated amorphous debris and multifocal areas of intraparenchymal hemorrhage, consistent with coagulative necrosis. Variably-sized regions of intraparenchymal hemorrhage were noted; these were most pronounced immediately adjacent to and within electrode insertion tracks similar to previous results in canine brain (Ellis et al, 2011). Remnant neurons within ablated regions were shrunken, had hypereosinophilic cytoplasm and showed nuclear pyknosis and/or karyolysis. Free glial nuclei in various states of degeneration were scattered throughout ablation zones.

All treatments resulted in zones of ablation visible on MRI (FIG. 7). The zones of ablation were achieved with ninety 50-μs pulses at a rate of one pulse per second. The Gadolinium (Gd) and Evan's Blue dyes were administered IP 5 minutes before the delivery of the pulses. In sham-treated rats in which the electrodes were inserted into the brain but no pulses applied, zones of ablation were limited to physical displacement of the brain parenchyma, which appeared as hypointense electrode tracks on T1W+Gd and T2W sequences (FIG. 7). No contrast enhancement or intraparenchymal uptake of Evan's blue in the adjacent brain was observed in sham-operated rats (FIG. 7). At all voltage-to-distance ratios examined, IRE treatment induced heterogeneous T2W zones of ablation characterized by a hypointense central lesion with perilesional T2W hyperintensity (FIG. 7) and markedly and uniformly contrast-enhancing zones of ablation that were sharply delineated from the adjacent brain tissue (FIG. 7). The positive correlation between the applied voltage-to-distance ratios and the extent of BBB disruption induced by IRE is indicated by the uniformly contrast-enhancing zones of ablation on the T1W+Gd MR images and corresponding Evan's Blue brain slices. IRE-induced zones of ablation are sharply demarcated from the surrounding brain parenchyma. Linear hypointensities in the center of the zones of ablation, corresponding to the electrode insertions, are evident in the MR images from the 600, 800, and 1000 V/cm treatments.

FIGS. 8A-8H are magnetic resonance images of brain sections showing qualitative representations of IRE-induced BBB disruption and in particular, 2D IRE lesion tracing on the coronal (FIG. 8A, FIG. 8B), dorsal (FIG. 8C, FIG. 8D), and sagittal (FIG. 8E, FIG. 8F) planes with the corresponding non-contiguous (FIG. 8G) and contiguous (FIG. 8H) 3D reconstruction zones of ablation representative of 400 V/cm and 1000 V/cm IRE treatments, respectively. These reconstructions illustrate the shapes of the IRE zones of ablation, which are consistent with the electric field distributions that would be generated with the electrode configuration and pulse parameters used here. By optimizing treatment protocols and electrode configurations, it is possible to disrupt the BBB to target different size and shapes of tissue.

On MRI scans (FIGS. 8A-8H), treatment at 200 V/cm and 400 V/cm induced two non-contiguous ovoid to spherical IRE zones of ablation centered around the electrodes tips (FIGS. 8A, 8C, 8E), with the largest cross-sectional area in the coronal plane along the electrode tract. 3D reconstructions demonstrated two separated spherical regions surrounding the 1-mm electrodes (FIG. 8F). IRE treatment at 600 V/cm, 800 V/cm, and 1000 V/cm resulted in a “peanut shape” lesion that was contiguous between the two electrodes (FIGS. 8B, 8D, 8F), with similar characteristics to the 3D reconstruction in FIG. 8H. The different reconstructed geometries for each applied voltage confirm the electric-field dependent effect of IRE. In addition, these results suggest that the threshold for IRE-induced BBB disruption is between 400 V/cm and 600 V/cm which is consistent with previous studies in brain (Garcia et al., 2010).

With histopathologic (FIGS. 6A-C), Evan's Blue (FIG. 7), and MRI (FIGS. 8A-8H) examinations, the extent of BBB disruption was positively correlated with the applied voltage-to-distance ratio. Objective measurements confirming this are provided in FIGS. 9A and 9B, in which the volumes (FIG. 9A) of gadolinium (Gd) enhancement and mean concentrations (FIG. 9B) are plotted as a function of the applied voltage-to-distance ratio and timing of Gd administration. Within each time points in which Gd was administered, linear correlations were determined between electric fields and volumes of ablation (−5 min: R²=0.8422, +5 min: R²=0.9654, +15 min: R²=0.9889, +30 min: R²=0.9243). There was a significant positive correlation of Gd volume (p<0.0001) and mean concentration (p=0.0077) with applied electric field. The negative correlation of Gd volume (p=0.0151) and concentration (p=0.0056) with time was also statistically significant, confirming the transient permeabilization surrounding the regions of ablation. Exposing the brain tissue to increasing applied electric fields resulted in larger volumes of Gd enhancement. Although the number of replicates is low, the finding of increasing volume of affected tissue with increasing voltage applied (for the electrode configuration and pulse parameters used) suggests that volume is directly related to voltage. Similarly, the finding of a trend toward decreased volumes with increasing delays after Gd administration suggests a possible transient quality to the permeabilization surrounding the regions of ablation. The linear fit used to correlate the electric field and zone of ablation was found appropriate using previously published data (Garcia P A, Rossmeisl J H, Jr., Neal R E, 2nd, Ellis T L, Davalos R V (2011) A Parametric Study Delineating Irreversible Electroporation from Thermal Damage Based on a Minimally Invasive Intracranial Procedure. Biomed Eng Online 10: 34). The mean concentrations of Gd within the reconstructed IRE-induced regions of BBB disruption are also positively correlated with the applied electric field. This provides evidence that with increasing electric field strengths even more electroporation is achieved and transport of Gd or other exogenous agents is enhanced.

Cross sectional areas of Gd enhancement around the rostral electrode were also calculated, to compare the results from the T1W+Gd MRI with the corresponding cross-sectional areas seen in the histopathology and gross pathology specimens along the coronal plane. Table 2 shows cross-sectional areas of Gd enhancement from the MRI, cross-sectional areas of IRE cell death derived from H&E images, and cross-sectional areas of permeabilization from the Evan's Blue. The cross-sectional areas of Gd enhancement (p<0.0001) and cell death (p<0.0001) surrounding the rostral electrode were evaluated via Standard Least Square Fit and showed a significant positive correlation with the applied electric field. No significant correlation was found between the cross-sectional areas of MRI enhancement and timing of Gd administration. The results indicate that the cross-sectional areas of Gd enhancement and Evan's Blue are predominantly greater than the cell death cross-sectional areas from the H&E stained sections, confirming the existence of the penumbra of transient BBB disruption.

TABLE 2 Resulting IRE-induced BBB disruption mean concentrations, volumes, and cross-sectional areas calculated using the Gd enhancement in MRI, H&E, and Evan's Blue. Mean Gd Gd Time E-Field Conc. (MRI) Gd (MRI) H&E Evan's Blue (min) (V/cm) (mg/ml) (mm³) (mm²) (mm²) (mm²) −5 0 0.012 1.62 0.00 1.31 −5 400 0.016 11.82 1.56 1.52 3.22 −5 600 0.021 8.97 4.22 3.14 3.98 −5 800 0.033 19.55 5.15 4.83 4.29 −5 1000 0.060 32.00 6.67 4.51 4.97 +5 0 0.004 1.26 0.46 1.14 +5 400 0.013 9.07 3.66 2.08 +5 600 0.023 19.83 4.05 3.82 +5 800 0.043 24.61 5.25 3.04 +5 1000 0.022 27.69 4.91 5.84 +15 200 0.002 1.39 1.22 1.39 +15 600 0.009 11.13 4.79 3.39 +15 1000 0.014 17.85 4.79 5.46 +30 400 0.011 1.93 1.17 1.09 +30 600 0.005 6.16 2.25 1.68 +30 800 0.013 18.71 6.25 4.63 Note: The cross-sectional areas were determined from the regions intersecting the rostral electrode tip.

3D MRI reconstructions of the rat brain were developed in order to simulate the experimental results found in the study in which ninety 50-μs pulses were delivered at 1000 V/cm voltage-to-distance ratio with 1-mm electrodes (0.45 mm diameter) using COMSOL Multiphysics version 4.3a (Burlington, Mass.) and the cross-sectional data from Table 2. Specifically, electric field and the resulting temperature distributions were simulated in order to illustrate the potential region of IRE ablation, BBB disruption, and elevated temperatures. FIG. 10A compares the volume of IRE ablation with the volume of BBB disruption. FIG. 10B compares the volume of IRE ablation with the volume of tissue with elevated temperatures (T>50° C.) at the completion of the ninety pulse IRE treatment. This result demonstrates that there might be some transient increase in the Temperature in the vicinity of the electrode-tissue interface but the majority of the tissue will be affected by the non-thermal mode of cell death. Ultimately, FIG. 10C displays the areas of IRE ablation, BBB disruption, and elevated temperatures (T>50° C.) surrounding the rostral electrode. It is important to know that the pulse parameters can be optimized to target a particular volume of ablation and surrounding region of BBB disruption for infiltrative cancer cell attack.

The same 3D MRI reconstruction was used to analyze the volumetric results of Gd enhancement from the experiments in Table 2. In this example we integrated the volume of brain tissue being exposed to identical pulse parameters performed experimentally and described in Table 1. In particular, FIG. 11A shows the 3D MRI reconstruction and the electrodes inserted into the brain tissue. FIG. 11B-11F replicated each of the treatments investigated and provides the electric field threshold that was required to match the volume of BBB disruption to the volume of Gd enhancement. Specifically, FIG. 11B (200 V/cm) did not have any detectable Gd enhancement during the analysis with Mimics software 14.1 (Materialise, Leuven, BG). However, the 400 V/cm (9.07 mm³=298 V/cm), 600 V/cm (19.83 mm³=328 V/cm), 800 V/cm (24.61 mm³=406 V/cm), and 1000 V/cm (27.69 mm³=476 V/cm) IRE treatments resulted in BBB disruption electric field thresholds between 298-476 V/cm as demonstrated in FIG. 11C-11F. It is important to note that these results were achieved with ninety 50-μs pulses delivered at 1 pulse per second with Gd administered 5 min post-IRE but could be optimized to achieve other therapeutic outcomes as well. Using rodents as predictive models, data herein is presented on the duration and extent of acute BBB disruption surrounding an IRE-induced zone of ablation. Not wishing to be bound by any one particular theory, it is believed that there is a minimal electric field at which BBB disruption occurs surrounding an IRE-induced zone of ablation and that this transient response can be measured using Gd uptake as a surrogate marker for BBB disruption. IRE was performed at different electric fields and varied the timing of Gd administration to estimate the duration of any reversible effects on BBB disruption. The results show representative minimal pulse parameters capable of effective BBB disruption and provide an estimate of the duration and extent of reversible effects on BBB disruption, showing the creation of a non-destructive penumbra of BBB disruption adjacent to regions of IRE-induced cell death occurs.

IRE-induced BBB disruption over the entire range of electric field strengths evaluated was observed. These results provide preliminary guidelines for electric field thresholds for IRE in the normal rodent brain. Histopathological examinations were consistent with previous pathological descriptions of IRE-induced cerebrocortical ablations (Ellis et al., 2011; Garcia et al., 2010) at applied voltage-to-distance ratios greater than 600 V/cm, while the morphology of brain tissue treated at voltage-to-distance ratios smaller than 400 V/cm was identical to sham-treated rodents. This indicates electroporation is predominantly or exclusively reversible at voltage-to-distance ratio strengths <400 V/cm in normal brain, using the pulse parameters applied herein. The extent of reversible BBB disruption induced by IRE is underestimated using methods based on H&E stained sections, when compared to paramagnetic contrast agents or vital dye surrogates of BBB disruption. Co-labeling methods, that simultaneously utilize both imaging contrast agents and vital dyes, would be recommended in future studies to define the reversible electroporation domain in brain tissue (Chopra A (2004-2010) Evans Blue-diethylenetriamine-N,N,N″,N″-pentaacetic acid-gadolinium. Molecular Imaging and Contrast Agent Database (MICAD). Oct. 25, 2007 ed: Bethesda (MD): National Center for Biotechnology Information (US)).

In BBB permeability modeling, the parenchymal uptake of low molecular weight, paramagnetic positive contrast imaging agents, such as Gd, is representative of solute and ion uptake during BBB disruption, while uptake of higher molecular weight, protein-bound vital dyes, such as Evan's Blue, indicate increased BBB permeability to protein. The observation of brain uptake of both Evan's Blue and Gd in all treatment groups indicates that IRE results in BBB permeability to solutes, ions, and protein, but the discrepancies observed in the lesion sizes as determined with Gd and Evan's Blue qualitatively suggest that BBB permeability induced by IRE is non-uniform. BBB permeability is likely a transient and dynamic process given the electroporation of tissue and disruption of microvascular blood flow that have been shown to occur during delivery of electric pulses (Ellis et al., 2011; Garcia et al., 2010; Garcia P A, Rossmeisl J H, Jr., Neal R E, 2nd, Ellis T L, Davalos R V (2011) A Parametric Study Delineating Irreversible Electroporation from Thermal Damage Based on a Minimally Invasive Intracranial Procedure. Biomed Eng Online 10: 34; Cemazar M, Parkins C S, Holder A L, Chaplin D J, Tozer G M, et al., (2001) Electroporation of human microvascular endothelial cells: evidence for an anti-vascular mechanism of electrochemotherapy. Br J Cancer 84: 565-570).

The results demonstrate significant correlations between the applied electric field and the timing and extent of Gd enhancement. The results also suggest there is a persistent effect on BBB disruption at +15 and +30 minutes post-treatment. This time frame may prove to be advantageous in that it may be feasible to use more advanced, perfusion-based MRI techniques in future studies with IRE in the brain (Mahmood F, Hansen R H, Agerholm-Larsen B, Jensen K S, Iversen H K, et al., (2011) Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Verification of Electroporation-Based Treatments. Journal of Membrane Biology 240: 131-138).

The present invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments having various features. In light of the disclosure provided above, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the practice of the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. One skilled in the art will recognize that the disclosed features may be used singularly, in any combination, or omitted based on the requirements and specifications of a given application or design. Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention. For example, the methods of the invention may be modified to treat a variety of CNS-related diseases and conditions (which encompass psychiatric/behavioral diseases or disorders), including, without limitation, acquired epileptiform aphasia, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, adrenoleukodystrophy, agenesis of the corpus callosum, agnosia, aicardi syndrome, Alexander disease, Alpers' disease, alternating hemiplegia, Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, anencephaly, Angelman syndrome, angiomatosis, anoxia, aphasia, apraxia, arachnoid cysts, arachnoiditis, Arnold-chiari malformation, arteriovenous malformation, Asperger's syndrome, ataxia telangiectasia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism, auditory processing disorder, autonomic dysfunction, back pain, Batten disease, Behcet's disease, Bell's palsy, benign essential blepharospasm, benign focal amyotrophy, benign intracranial hypertension, bilateral frontoparietal polymicrogyria, binswanger's disease, blepharospasm, Bloch-sulzberger syndrome, brachial plexus injury, brain abscess, brain damage, brain injury, brain tumor, spinal tumor, Brown-sequard syndrome, canavan disease, carpal tunnel syndrome (cts), causalgia, central pain syndrome, central pontine myelinolysis, centronuclear myopathy, cephalic disorder, cerebral aneurysm, cerebral arteriosclerosis, cerebral atrophy, cerebral gigantism, cerebral palsy, charcot-marie-tooth disease, chiari malformation, chorea, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (“CIDP”), chronic pain, chronic regional pain syndrome, Coffin lowry syndrome, coma (including persistent vegetative state), congenital facial diplegia, corticobasal degeneration, cranial arteritis, craniosynostosis, Creutzfeldt-jakob disease, cumulative trauma disorders, Cushing's syndrome, cytomegalic inclusion body disease (“CIBD”), cytomegalovirus infection, dandy-walker syndrome, Dawson disease, de morsier's syndrome, Dejerine-klumpke palsy, Dejerine-sottas disease, delayed sleep phase syndrome, dementia, dermatomyositis, developmental dyspraxia, diabetic neuropathy, diffuse sclerosis, dysautonomia, dyscalculia, dysgraphia, dyslexia, dystonia, early infantile epileptic encephalopathy, empty sella syndrome, encephalitis, encephalocele, encephalotrigeminal angiomatosis, encopresis, epilepsy, Erb's palsy, erythromelalgia, essential tremor, Fabry's disease, Fahr's syndrome, fainting, familial spastic paralysis, febrile seizures, fisher syndrome, Friedreich's ataxia, Gaucher's disease, Gerstmann's syndrome, giant cell arteritis, giant cell inclusion disease, globoid cell leukodystrophy, gray matter heterotopia, Guillain-barré syndrome, htiv-1 associated myelopathy, Hallervorden-spatz disease, head injury, headache, hemifacial spasm, hereditary spastic paraplegia, heredopathia atactica polyneuritiformis, herpes zoster oticus, herpes zoster, hirayama syndrome, holoprosencephaly, Huntington's disease, hydranencephaly, hydrocephalus, hypercortisolism, hypoxia, immune-mediated encephalomyelitis, inclusion body myositis, incontinentia pigmenti, infantile phytanic acid storage disease, infantile refsum disease, infantile spasms, inflammatory myopathy, intracranial cyst, intracranial hypertension, Joubert syndrome, Kearns-sayre syndrome, Kennedy disease, kinsbourne syndrome, Klippel feil syndrome, Krabbe disease, Kugelberg-welander disease, kuru, lafora disease, Lambert-eaton myasthenic syndrome, Landau-kleffner syndrome, lateral medullary (Wallenberg) syndrome, learning disabilities, leigh's disease, Lennox-gastaut syndrome, Lesch-nyhan syndrome, leukodystrophy, lewy body dementia, lissencephaly, locked-in syndrome, Lou Gehrig's disease, lumbar disc disease, lyme disease—neurological sequelae, machado-joseph disease (spinocerebellar ataxia type 3), macrencephaly, megalencephaly, Melkersson-rosenthal syndrome, Meniere's disease, meningitis, Menkes disease, metachromatic leukodystrophy, microcephaly, migraine, Miller Fisher syndrome, mini-strokes, mitochondrial myopathies, mobius syndrome, monomelic amyotrophy, motor neurone disease, motor skills disorder, moyamoya disease, mucopolysaccharidoses, multi-infarct dementia, multifocal motor neuropathy, multiple sclerosis, multiple system atrophy with postural hypotension, muscular dystrophy, myalgic encephalomyelitis, myasthenia gravis, myelinoclastic diffuse sclerosis, myoclonic encephalopathy of infants, myoclonus, myopathy, myotubular myopathy, myotonia congenita, narcolepsy, neurofibromatosis, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, neurological manifestations of aids, neurological sequelae of lupus, neuromyotonia, neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis, neuronal migration disorders, niemann-pick disease, non 24-hour sleep-wake syndrome, nonverbal learning disorder, O'sullivan-mcleod syndrome, occipital neuralgia, occult spinal dysraphism sequence, ohtahara syndrome, olivopontocerebellar atrophy, opsoclonus myoclonus syndrome, optic neuritis, orthostatic hypotension, overuse syndrome, palinopsia, paresthesia, Parkinson's disease, paramyotonia congenita, paraneoplastic diseases, paroxysmal attacks, parry-romberg syndrome (also known as rombergs syndrome), pelizaeus-merzbacher disease, periodic paralyses, peripheral neuropathy, persistent vegetative state, pervasive developmental disorders, photic sneeze reflex, phytanic acid storage disease, pick's disease, pinched nerve, pituitary tumors, pmg, polio, polymicrogyria, polymyositis, porencephaly, post-polio syndrome, postherpetic neuralgia (“PHN”), postinfectious encephalomyelitis, postural hypotension, Prader-willi syndrome, primary lateral sclerosis, prion diseases, progressive hemifacial atrophy (also known as Romberg's syndrome), progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, progressive sclerosing poliodystrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, pseudotumor cerebri, ramsay-hunt syndrome (type I and type II), Rasmussen's encephalitis, reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome, refsum disease, repetitive motion disorders, repetitive stress injury, restless legs syndrome, retrovirus-associated myelopathy, rett syndrome, Reye's syndrome, Romberg's syndrome, rabies, Saint Vitus' dance, Sandhoff disease, schizophrenia, Schilder's disease, schizencephaly, sensory integration dysfunction, septo-optic dysplasia, shaken baby syndrome, shingles, Shy-drager syndrome, Sjögren's syndrome, sleep apnea, sleeping sickness, snatiation, Sotos syndrome, spasticity, spina bifida, spinal cord injury, spinal cord tumors, spinal muscular atrophy, spinal stenosis, Steele-richardson-olszewski syndrome, see progressive supranuclear palsy, spinocerebellar ataxia, stiff-person syndrome, stroke, Sturge-weber syndrome, subacute sclerosing panencephalitis, subcortical arteriosclerotic encephalopathy, superficial siderosis, sydenham's chorea, syncope, synesthesia, syringomyelia, tardive dyskinesia, Tay-sachs disease, temporal arteritis, tetanus, tethered spinal cord syndrome, Thomsen disease, thoracic outlet syndrome, tic douloureux, Todd's paralysis, Tourette syndrome, transient ischemic attack, transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, transverse myelitis, traumatic brain injury, tremor, trigeminal neuralgia, tropical spastic paraparesis, trypanosomiasis, tuberous sclerosis, vasculitis including temporal arteritis, Von Hippel-lindau disease (“VHL”), Viliuisk encephalomyelitis (“VE”), Wallenberg's syndrome, Werdnig-hoffman disease, west syndrome, whiplash, Williams syndrome, Wilson's disease, and Zellweger syndrome. It is thus appreciated that all CNS-related states and disorders could be treated through the methods of the invention by appropriate modifications, such as the location of placement of the electrode and choice of the exogenous agent administered, which may also include but is not limited to a neurotrophic factor, an enzyme, a neurotransmitter, a neuromodulator, an antibiotic, and an antiviral agent.

It is noted in particular that where a range of values is provided in this specification, each value between the upper and lower limits of that range is also specifically disclosed. The upper and lower limits of these smaller ranges may independently be included or excluded in the range as well. The singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary in nature and that variations that do not depart from the essence of the invention fall within the scope of the invention. Further, all of the references cited in this disclosure are each individually incorporated by reference herein in their entireties and as such are intended to provide an efficient way of supplementing the enabling disclosure of this invention as well as provide background detailing the level of ordinary skill in the art. 

1. A system for ablating brain tissue of a living mammal comprising: a voltage generator operable to generate a plurality of electrical pulses between first and second electrodes; and a treatment planning module adapted to control the voltage generator to generate the plurality of pulses which are predetermined to: cause irreversible electroporation (IRE) of brain tissue of the mammal within a target ablation zone; and cause a temporary disruption of a blood brain barrier (BBB) within a surrounding zone that surrounds the target ablation zone to allow material in a blood vessel to be transferred to the surrounding zone through the temporarily disrupted BBB.
 2. The system of claim 1, further comprising a detector that detects the occurrence of IRE in the target ablation zone and temporary BBB disruption in the surrounding zone.
 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the treatment planning module is adapted to control the voltage generator to generate each electrical pulse as a direct current pulse having a pulse duration of at least 5 microseconds and provide for a voltage-to-distance ratio of from about 10 V/cm to about 10,000 V/cm.
 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the treatment planning module is adapted to control the voltage generator to generate each electrical pulse as a direct current pulse having a pulse duration of between 5 and 100 microseconds and provide for a voltage-to-distance ratio of from about 10 V/cm to about 10,000 V/cm.
 5. A system for ablating brain tissue of a living mammal comprising: a voltage generator operable to generate a plurality of electrical pulses between first and second electrodes; a memory; a processor coupled to the memory; and a treatment planning module stored in the memory and executable by the processor, the treatment planning module adapted to control the voltage generator to generate the plurality of pulses which are predetermined to be: sufficiently strong to cause non-thermal irreversible electroporation (NTIRE) of brain tissue of the mammal within a target ablation zone; and sufficiently strong to cause a temporary disruption of a blood brain barrier (BBB) within a surrounding zone that surrounds the target ablation zone, but insufficient to cause NTIRE in the surrounding zone, to allow material in a blood vessel to be transferred to the surrounding zone through the temporarily disrupted BBB.
 6. The system of claim 5, further comprising a detector that detects the occurrence of IRE in the target ablation zone and temporary BBB disruption in the surrounding zone.
 7. The system of claim 5, wherein the treatment planning module is adapted to control the voltage generator to generate each electrical pulse as a direct current pulse having a pulse duration of at least 5 microseconds and provide for a voltage-to-distance ratio of from about 10 V/cm to about 10,000 V/cm.
 8. The system of claim 5, wherein the treatment planning module is adapted to control the voltage generator to generate each electrical pulse as a direct current pulse having a pulse duration of between 5 and 100 microseconds and provide for a voltage-to-distance ratio of from about 10 V/cm to about 10,000 V/cm.
 9. A method for ablating brain tissue of a living mammal comprising: placing first and second electrodes in a brain of the living mammal; applying a plurality of electrical pulses through the first and second placed electrodes which are predetermined to: cause irreversible electroporation (IRE) of brain tissue of the mammal within a target ablation zone; and cause a temporary disruption of a blood brain barrier (BBB) within a surrounding zone that surrounds the target ablation zone to allow material in a blood vessel to be transferred to the surrounding zone through the temporarily disrupted BBB.
 10. The method of claim 9, further comprising delivering large molecule material within a blood vessel of the brain, the large molecule being sufficiently large to be blocked by the BBB from passing through the blood vessel.
 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the large molecule material is delivered to the blood vessel prior to applying the plurality of electrical pulses.
 12. The method of claim 10, wherein the large molecule includes a chemotherapeutic agent.
 13. The method of claim 9, after applying the plurality of electrical pulses, further comprising detecting the occurrence of IRE in the target ablation zone and temporary BBB disruption in the surrounding zone.
 14. The method of claim 9, wherein the step of applying includes applying each electrical pulse as a direct current pulse having a pulse duration of at least 5 microseconds.
 15. The method of claim 9, wherein the step of applying includes applying each electrical pulse as a direct current pulse having a pulse duration of between 5 and 100 microseconds.
 16. The method of claim 9, wherein the step of applying includes applying the plurality of pulses which are predetermined to be: sufficiently strong to cause non-thermal irreversible electroporation (NTIRE) of the brain tissue within the target ablation zone; and sufficiently strong to cause a temporary disruption of BBB within the surrounding zone, but insufficient to cause NTIRE in the surrounding zone.
 17. The method of claim 10, wherein the large molecule material is delivered to the blood vessel after applying the plurality of electrical pulses.
 18. The method of claim 10, wherein the large molecule material is present in the blood vessel during the applying of the plurality of electrical pulses.
 19. The method of claim 10, wherein the large molecule material is delivered to the blood vessel in the range of 5 minutes before and 30 minutes after the step of applying the plurality of electrical pulses.
 20. The system of claim 1, wherein the brain tissue is malignant tissue.
 21. The method of claim 9, wherein the brain tissue is malignant tissue. 